Categories
Articles

Wal-Mart (WMT): Time For Scott To Go

World’s biggest retailer Wal-Mart (WMT) said Tuesday quarterly profits rose 8% to $2.83 billion ($0.68/share) and revenue rose 8.5% to $86.41 billion — hitting analyst estimates exactly. Wal-Mart said Sam’s Club and international operations were its strongest areas, while food and generic drug sales were large growth sections. It expects domestic comparable-store sales to rise 1-2% in the coming quarter after a 0.6% first-quarter rise. It forecasts Q2 earnings from continuing operations of $0.75-0.95; analysts had been calling for $0.79. In the company’s earnings press release, CEO Lee Scott shrewdly observed: “While these are record sales and earnings, we feel there was an opportunity to have done better,”

Thanks for the heads up Lee. Kind of like General Custard saying “we should have brought more guys”

It is time for Lee to go. It is not for the standard reason people give, the stagnant share price. Let’s be honest here. If you were dumb enough at the turn of the century to pay 60 times earnings for a massive retailer growing at less than 1/2 that, you deserve the predicament you are now in. Given Wal-Mart’s scale, it would have been impossible for ANY CEO to get performance out of the company to justify that high of a PE ratio and avoid the eventual share decline. The price of the stock had to fall.

Why should Scott go? I have been in 4 Wal-Mart the past 2 weeks and one thing sticks out. They have not changed at all the past 7 years. Everything feels the same, the look , the merchandise, the people, everything. The worst part is, there seems to be no plans to change anything. If you are struggling with earnings and growth because you have become stale, do something different. You just can’t sit there, no matter who you are. How about this? Let’s update the clothing. We have heard for years that Target has had great success with low cost brand name designer clothing. Wal-Mart’s is just low cost and in an increasingly brand conscious world, it just is not cutting it. Let spruce it up a bit. Maybe we could take some of the $7 plus billion you are sitting on and buyback a meaningful amount of shares? Wal-Mart is increasing cash at an over a billion dollar a year pace and last year spent just over that on share buybacks. Let’s take $3 billion and make a dent in the shares outstanding ( 1.5%) and give more back to shareholders if we are not going to put it work anywhere else.

Here is another issue. When I go into as Target, I can easily fins my way around because the layouts of the stores are very similar. It makes may shopping experience less frustrating. Are there any two Wal-Marts that are laid out the same? It makes it very difficult to “just run in” to a Wal-Mart to pick something up. Given the choice, I will choose a Target for thje convenience.

Wal-Mart’s image has taken a hit. When people want something “cheap” they think Wal-Mart, when the want a value, they think “Target”. Because Scott seems to have no desire to change that, it is time to go….

I hold no position in any company listed above.

7 replies on “Wal-Mart (WMT): Time For Scott To Go”

It is evident that you do not follow Wal-Mart very closely. As part of a campaign to encourage shoppers to “look beyond the basics” like food and consumables, Wal-Mart did attempt to add more “fashion-forward” apparel by launching the Metro 7 line (and later the George ME line). For several months following the launch of Metro 7, it was touted as a huge success; Wal-Mart couldn’t stock it quickly enough. Then a funny thing happened. Their apparel sales took a nosedive, and are *still* cited, along with Home, as Wal-Mart’s softest department.

They are also in the second year of a pretty significant turnaround plan. Their entire senior management team has been juggled since September 2005. They recruited a team of marketing executives with deep experience in the consumer products industry to build world-class marketing capabilities at Wal-Mart–essentially from the ground up. And, though it isn’t fully public, they are focusing heavily on customer experience and format innovation, with recent executive appointments focused on those areas.

I hope that anyone reading this post doesn’t base his investment decisions on the isolated experience of a lone analyst. Wal-Mart itself will tell you that more than 30% of its stores are “unacceptable” to employees and customers. But, far from being complacent, the company is working hard to turn the situation around.

Anon,

thank you for reading..

my comment would be they have been “working hard at it” for 5 years now. time for some results.

i would love to be a shareholder but the company is listless now. a change in leadership would change that.

the clothing “lines” they introduced where to honest, a joke which is why they flopped. when Target has Liz Lange and and that Issac Mizrahi (sp?)guy doing designer clothes at affordable prices for target, Scott should be embarrassed no, humiliated at what he put in his stores.

this is what i mean. let’s go guys…

Please tell us when WMT was trading at 60x forward year earnings? Sotkc earned $1.25 in ’99 and expectations were for around $1.40 in 200. Stock was trading between 45 and 55 in the back half of 1999, which gets to a multiple range of 32x to 40x expected 2000 earnings.

Your posts on retail stocks (the only ones i read) tend to be full of mistakes and complete misunderstandings.

What investment professional values a company on trailing earnings?

The company earned 99c in the year ended 1/31/99, which is considered 1998. They earned $1.25 in the year ending 1/31/200, which is considered 1999. And they earned $1.40 in the year ended 1/31/2001, which is considered 2000.

Many retailers end their fiscal years on January 31 to capture the totality of the Christmas season from November-January.

If you are going to publish public commentary on retail stock, you really should know this stuff. This is as basic as it gets.

Any interest in taking back your snide “better luck next time”?

no….

i do not buy a stock on forward earnings. that is guessing..

when i buy, i do it based on “what is” at the time i buy it…

then i base that current premium or discount to the future growth eapected and deterrmine if the current valuation is good for me..

let’s use your #s.. that still gives us a 54 PE in Jan 2000 (i do not quibble over 6 points) for a company growing 1/2 that…

if you have read anything i have every popsted, that is a recipe for failure in investing….

so, how many shares did you buy then?

i still would love to be a shareholder, i just need to actually see a direction from them

Hi. I like your blog. I also like Walmart. There is everything there. Everything I need. The prices are moderate. The customer service is also perfect. Personally I consider it to be one of the greatest. People on http://www.pissedconsumer.com express their dissatisfactions with the company and if you have something in common to say then rush there and do that!!!!!!

Comments are closed.