Activist Mark Wattles has had the best line to date on Circuit City’s (CC) turnaround effort.
Wattles said management “has repeatedly touted the fact that they have cut $200 million of annualized selling, general and administrative expenses while ignoring the fact that approximately $500 million of gross profit has been wiped-out in the process.”
Beautiful…
He has also nominated 5 people to the Board of Directors and a proxy fight is on.
I first wrote about CC almost a year ago now and speculated it may be a good buy-out candidate. Not soon after that I backed off that claim after watching Schoonover & Crew’s various missteps and have since said that the company is still a good buy-out candidate, but not until current management is gone.
The WJS ran a piece Thursday that said “The company has a lot of financial commitments to stores in sub-par locations. Many retailers have gone the way of all flesh. It’s a precarious industry. Their former big box stores litter the landscape like giant ruins. Circuit City could certainly follow suit. The advantage of a $4.65 share price, as speculators are wont to joke, is that you know your downside. That’s even more true of the options. There is nothing wrong with taking a flyer, so long as you know that’s what you’re doing.”
Now, to a point the author is correct in that at $4.50 a share, the downside is minimal. But, unless you buy a bunch, so is the upside. Your profit or loss is based on what your total investment is, regardless of share price.
Whether a stock is $100 or $2, really does not matter, it is the dollar amount you buy that matters. If I by 2 shares at $100 or 100 shares at $2, my investment is the same.
All that being said, I may buy the day Schoonover leaves, but not a second before. Given the current economy and his track record, $4.50 is much more likely to become $2.50 than $6.50 in the near future.
If shareholders are lucky, Wattles gets his wish….
Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.