Categories
Articles

Bill Parcells and Sears Holdings

Bill Parcells had a great quote that has always stuck with me. He was asked about his team at the time that was 2-6 but had lost some close games whether or not he felt the team was better than its record. His reply, “You are what you are”. If you are 2-6 that is what you you are, nothing more and nothing less.

Here is a recent article on Sears Holdings (SHLD) that bares reading.

Why do I bring up Parcells? Well, his quote has a lot to do with current perceptions of Sears.

Sears, is currently a retailer that is struggling. It should be noted that this is not a current situation held by Sears only, retailers, expect Wal-Mart (WMT) and Target (TGT) all are. Now, Lampert is 100% correct when he says “We’re the $50 billion company that people think doesn’t have any customers or relevance,”.

That is true Sears is by no means anywhere near “in trouble”. Cash is great, debt is insignificant and the balance sheet is pristine for a retailer in the current environment.

All that, however does not comfort many shareholders who have watched the stock fall 50% in the past year. Again, a 50% drop is number held by scores of other retailers (JC Penny (JCP), Macy’s (M)for starters) but again, it is what is it, lousy.

Back to football…

Had you been a person who bet of football in 1995 and watched the Patriots that year (the year Parcells made the quote), you would have seen a team with a strong leader that made some mistakes that had caused it to lose some games it otherwise would have won. The team had a good young quarterback, strong defense ,capable receivers and a good kicker (not to mention great coaching). In short, all the ingredients where there for success. A misstep here and there caused poor results.

One could perhaps see the “value” in the team and recognized that a little tweaking could result in a dramatically different outcome the following year.

Had you gone to Vegas that off-season recognizing all this and bet the Patriots would have made the Playoffs and / or the Super Bowl the next year, the odds you would have gotten were wonderful. When they actually made both the following season, you would have laughed all the way to the bank

Parcells, recognizing the shortcomings in the team made some changes but stuck to his core philosophy that had worked in the past. The result? Success

Sears:
See the similarities? Lampert has acknowledged some mistake and is trying to take steps to correct them. A new CEO, new structure to maximize brand value and and new leader for those brands are in the works. What has not changed is the core strategy of patience and disciplined capital expenditures. That strategy has made early shareholders very wealthy even after the recent stock slide and is a proven long term one.

Those who think Sears is on the brink of extinction are like the football fans who have a 5-5 team and say they’ve “been lucky and should be 2-8”, well, they aren’t, they are 5-5. Conversely, the retail environment will not turn anytime soon so the same 5-5 team cannot be said “should be 7-3 because they have been unlucky” (in this case the “bad luck” is the economy), they are 5-5.

What one can do is look forward and see a very smart leader, correcting errors, with a very strong core (balance sheet) and a proven track record. Based on that you could say the current situation is not reflective of the future results one should anticipate.

Hence, value investing in Sears………

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD, WMT, none

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

10 replies on “Bill Parcells and Sears Holdings”

The beauty in a free market is that people like Mr Cra-market have the right to sell the Giants organization on any off year. It is his right, and I encourage it 🙂

Viado your a fool.

In short after a while one gets use to the taste of manure.
Especially you Todd.

Todd bull manure and why have you not answered the questions in your last post.

Do you think we are fools.

Just a note Todd has not answered several questions to him in his latest blog.

Anon,

you are the only one I actually think is a fool……

should you pose a worthwhile question, I will answer, just like the other ones i have

otherwise, myself and the rest of us here will continue to ignore you

Todd,it appears the hard questions are the ones you avoid and do not answer.

They appear in your blog on Lampert not going private.

Be a man and answers the questions and admit when you are wrong.

Just a note I did not post the questions,I was just waiting on your answers,the questions were not foolish at all if anything and were not biased in either direction you just did not answer.

Good post. Not only are they sticking to their game plan, they are getting better. I noticed today for the first time in a Land’s End email that it recommended going to Sears to buy Land’s End. Taken too long yes, but the brands are starting to get rolled out and I think the strategy will work. Not a homerun, slam dunk, but it will be a net positive.

In my opinion Sears is the most interesting, longterm stock available today on Wall Street. Why?

Business, brands, real estate (heck just deduct the market value of Sears Canada and the cash, and this thing looks absurdly priced)

Dedicated, aligned owner and management.

Best shareholders money can’t buy (longterm, retail savvy, activist if necessary)

Best

Dr J

Long and strong

im really not sure why we go through all this but i keep coming back to this site hoping to find a new and interesting view on sears. Now i havent really been in this one too long, and to be honest i’ve only been in this one for a few days but i think anyone who is short this story needs to come up a really convincing story as opposed to childish remarks. Todd, personally i think you have been in this one too long, and I dread everytime you tell me that EL is a really smart manager. So far the story is a shambles and there are no positives – yes revs are $50bn but they are going down, and the margin on them is worse than any other retailer I can think of. The fact that their structure allows for supportive factors to the margin and yet these margins are still bad is concerning. Add in the fact that they have their own brands etc and still do worse than others who on-sell is confusing to say the least if not embarrassing. Canada good; real estate good; the rest is a write off.. a turnaround story with no turn in sight. Can argue about the capital structure or anything like that but I am concerned that there is no effort to give us a catalyst. And yes every story needs one – a catalyst.

todd – when are you long SHLD? did you / have you benefit(ed) from the Kmart acquisition?

Comments are closed.