Categories
Articles

More Thoughts on General Growth Properties

Took the evening to digest the General Growth Properties (GGP) news. Here is what I came up with for to affirm the investing thesis of the equity (stock).

Wall St. Newsletters

First, here is the news (linked for those who have already read it):

So, why invest in the common stock, does bankruptcy destroy it, why aren’t lenders forcing it, will it be a Chapter 11 (reorganization) or Chapter 7 (liquidation)?

The answers are all tied up and related so lets go through it:

If (when) there is a bankruptcy filing, why 11 and not 7? The simple answer is having the second largest mall operator go into liquidation and throwing 200 million square feet of retail space up for sale would destroy the commercial real estate market. Why? The sudden supply of properties without bidders (loans still are very tough to get) would mean they would have to be placed on the market below “fire sale” prices to sell. Because of that, all other operators real estate values would fall, dramatically, and in turn, causing debt covenants for them to be tripped. That would create a cascading effect on the whole industry. For those not sure, this would be a very, very bad thing. You think you have seen write-downs in home mortgage loans at banks? Force liquidation of GGP and as the saying goes “you ain’t seen nothing yet”.

It also means the banks holding the loans on the properties would then be forced to take pennies on the dollar, very bad for them. In a Chapter 7, shareholders, debt holders and the industry as a whole suffer. No one wins.

So, if we rule out liquidation. What happens in Chapter 11? Who wins there? Here is what Bill Ackman said yesterday in the WSJ:

Some investors, however, consider a bankruptcy filing likely. Among them is activist investor Bill Ackman of Pershing Square Capital Management LLC, who bought 7.5% of General Growth’s stock in recent months and put another 18% under swap contracts in a bet that the company’s equity will survive a bankruptcy unscathed. Mr. Ackman also expects to soon get a seat on General Growth’s board.

“We think the company will ultimately have to file for bankruptcy, but we think that it’s a wholly solvent company with a liquidity problem,” Mr. Ackman said in an interview Monday. “I don’t think they’ll need to dilute shareholders. All they need to do is extend the maturities [in bankruptcy court] and they can refinance those debts as they come due.”

Now, one must know that Ackman took his stake AFTER GGP’s troubles were known. This is not a situation where we have an investor trying desperately to save a bad investment. He bought in knowing this scenario we now face was likely.

The typical bankrupcty is forced because the liabilities (debt) outsize the assets. In this case the common shareholders are wiped out. But, we know that the assets GGP has are in excess of the liabilities. In this case, even in a worse case Chapter 11, shareholders are not wiped out.

But, this goes even further. Again from Ackman “Most of the time, insolvent companies go bankrupt,” Ackman said. “It’s rare for a solvent company to go bankrupt. This is a solvent company with a liquidity problem.”

General Growth is not losing money. Rents are stable, occupancy rates are over 90% and FFO (funds from operations) remain healthy. What is the problem? Credit. GGP has loan due that they typically just rollover into longer maturities. With the current credit “lock down”, they cannot do that. That means bulk payment come due and the cash is not there. It should be noted that this is not an odd situation, this is what REIT’s typically do with their debt.

With a Chapter 11 debt holders are put in a room and told by a Judge, “we can pay you all 100% but we need to change and lengthen maturities OR we can liquidate and you can pick up scraps for pennies on the dollar”. Here are the new terms. The choice is rather obvious

The banks all recognize this too. This is the reason they have not been paid a dime since late last year and have not forced a Chapter 11 filing. They do not want to take the risk of writing down loan portfolio’s. Remember, our mark-to-market world means they just do not just write down GGP loans, they then have to write down ALL of them on their books. Again, this is very bad. So we get endless extensions to pay.

Why? The banks are riding this out. If we get MTM changes in Congress then we may see the log jam break. In that case a Chapter 11 would not have a cascading effect on their whole portfolio and restructuring the loans to again begin receiving payments makes perfect sense. They may be hoping for an economic turnaround late this year that enables GGP to sell some property to pay them off. They may all be playing a waiting game hoping someone restructures and set the bar for the rest of them that is better than a bankruptcy judge will do.

Who knows the exact reason why for each lender. We do know what they don’t want right now, a Chapter 11 filing. If they wanted it they could force it easily.

Because of the financial situation of GGP, there is no need to convert debt to equity. Restructuring the loans would allow for payments to be made, equity holders would remain intact, the banks again have performing loans on their books and everyone is happy…..VERY happy.

I think the specter of Ackman going on the board must give the banks pause and perhaps want them to restructure sooner rather than later. Then knowing he wants a Chapter 11 I am guessing will bring people to the negotiating table a bit faster…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GGP

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

4 replies on “More Thoughts on General Growth Properties”

But why would the existing debt holder extend their maturity and, at least until liquidity and valuations return to normal, take equity risk while the existing equity stays intact. In a nutshell, why would the debt give concessions without ample (read: all the equity) compensation?

assets > liabilities. equity holders will not be wiped out. in a BK debt debt holders would have Judge give them new terms. If they do it now, they can at least negotiate them. That is why ackman wants BK. judge will do it nice and neat. it is also the reason for the now over 1yr long extensions. banks are hoping something happens to avoid BK

I think there is a crucial point being missed. The 2006 secured credit line ($2bil) is the biggest concern, as the TRC bonds are already trading @ below 30%. Now the 2006 credit lines are secured by GGP's equity interest in GGPLPllc & TRCLP. As a result a forced liquidation on by the secured parties would put the equity intrests in these entities up for auction not properties or real estate. The Banks can bid up to the debt amount to take these entities over and a result would gain full ownership of 90% of GGP. This would not impact the real estate market negitavely at all.
Having said that, I agree that the banks will not force a secured party forlosure for the because a forclosure will prompt a chapter 11 filling that would result in a drawn out battle. This battle will hurt the banks in the following 4 ways;
1.
The banks will be forced to mark the loans down, thus will hurt their capital base.
2. The battle will bring these loans under their regulators radar and they may get forced to sell the loans at less then the current carried amount.
3. The TRC bondholders will be prompted to demand control of TRC cashflow while the bank representing the 2006 credit facilities are now calling the shots.
4. The franchise value may get destroyed in a drawn out battle. Jack Gold.
Jackgold1@ao.com

Jack,

the $2 billion is “non recourse” to the holding company. that means they can force liquidation of the llc, but not the holding co. that is probably why they have not moved yet.

Comments are closed.