Categories
Articles

Andrew Liveris (DOW) Interview: Part 3, Dow Ag

In part three we discuss Dow Ag and the agricultural sector in general including DuPont (DD) and Monsanto (MON).

Todd:
Dow Ag. Roughly a third of earnings in the most recent quarter were Dow Ag. After you sell the commodity business we are looking well in excess of that. I have not been able to find what percent of future earnings you expect them to be and what type of growth and how far out, as right now you are at about 20-25% annual EPS growth at Dow Ag. Going out 2009-2010 and beyond, to me 20% -25% EPS growth there seems sustainable if not surpassable. Accurate or no?

Andrew:
I think you are more accurate than not, remember the current % of Dow earnings is because AG is front loaded. It tends to be a first half year event for all of us because we are in the northern hemisphere and that’s whether its Dow (DOW), DuPont (DD) or Monsanto (MON). The whole year happens in the first six months. We have some southern hemisphere exposure notably Brazil and Argentina and my country Australia, but most of it is titled towards the northern hemisphere as a % of total earnings. Those numbers are distorted at this moment, but if you take the whole year and you say in ’07 Dow AG earned about 10% to 15% of Dow’s earnings but their growth rate was like you said 20 some odd percent for the last five years.

They achieved that through 2 mechanisms one of which will continue to be a big plus that will ultimate if not continue that 20% ramp up it will get very close. The first mechanism is we have been levering Dow’s considerable operational efficiencies over to Dow’s Agroscience. Even though it is a small co. $3 to $4 billion in revenue it has the power of a $50 billion co. in terms of operational excellence in its manufacturing, plants and supply chain. In its governance and share services it operates with its access to big company infrastructure, that’s number one.

That’s helped a lot of the cost line. Number two, the most exciting part is its pipeline. I mean, four years ago we made a conscious decision we said,”look, we’re never going to be a big seed co. because its too expensive, one of these days we might be able to find an answer on U.S. corn, but between now and then let’s rev up the technology engine and frankly not just in bio and seeds and traits in germplasm, but also in crop chemicals.” I don’t care what people say, GMOs will not replace crop chemicals in totality because growers will always need variety in their toolbox, its about diversity of solution and biotech cannot answer everything.

So we said “let’s put R & D in focus on the pipeline that we now have” in crop chemicals in particular things that are not just in corn, but outside of corn, in cotton, rapeoil and canola, in seed ,in soy beans and of course over range and pasture. The crop chemical R & D pipeline we have right now and what we have done in traits and in particular our new traits that we have announced plus the SmartStax agreement with Monsanto, have put us in a tremendous position. By 2010 when SmartStax gets launched, when our new traits get launched and our crop protection pipeline comes through, the R & D engine will yield real margin expansion for Dow AG.

I happen to think that Dow Ag in many ways doesn’t need to have big revenues b/c its margins at 16%, 18%, 20% bottom line margins is packing a big punch in terms of its ability to deliver margin despite its size. We’re increasing the R & D spending there. Dow Ag has a quarter of the R & D spending as a company which is a phenomenal statement when considering the size of the company we are and out thee in the future Todd we might be able to find rationalization opportunity and I will say out there, we’ll find another one. In the meantime keep making that growth story.

Todd:
That was actually the next question. Ag sector valuations are stratospheric just now.

Andrew:
Oh yea, I mean look, what were seeing now of the whole food change now started by corn and ethanol, that whole thing. Having said that, we’re seeing China, this whole point about China’s surge and as the Chinese eat more protien, eat more animals, those animals have to be nutured on agriculture, agriculture comes from feed, feed comes from corn and you know, there you go.

The food price things is real because of China’s assention and I do think that’s going to get worse before it get better and I think the world is going to have to address it. I do not know what the systems will be. I do think the poverty side of it is big. The agricultural sector and the commodity boom in agriculture is compelling valuations to stratospheres, I mean Monsanto is the great flag carrier there, they are doing great and it wasn’t long ago they were on their knees.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long Dow, none

Todd Sullivan's- ValuePlays

↑ Grab this Headline Animator

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

One reply on “Andrew Liveris (DOW) Interview: Part 3, Dow Ag”

More Mergers. Kraft should be next.

Kraft (with a Mkt Cap: $32.56B) should buy General Mills ( with a Mkt Cap: $15.56B). This is going to be huge as it would create a company with market valuation of +$48B. Putting Kraft’s brands alongside General Mills' brands the world's largest branded food and beverage company with revenues of over $55.85B annually. The synergies alone would be worth $2B annually.
Kraft has at least eight or nine brands with annual revenue of at least about $1 billion each. These include Kraft cheeses, dinners and dressings; Oscar Mayer
meats; Philadelphia cream cheese; Maxwell House coffee; Nabisco cookies and crackers and its
Oreo brand; Jacobs coffees; Milka chocolates; and LU biscuits. The combined companies could be reorganized into the following business segments: Beverages, Cheese, Convenient Meals , Grocery, Snacks & Cereals. Each business would focus on finding synergies for Existing and Developing Markets. With operations in 70 countries and the selling of products in 150
countries, there are a lot opportunities for synergies from a backroom perspective
A merger between the two companies would like to earnings improvement in 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartiles.
A merger with Kraft would allow for expansion of GIS joint ventures which is a real hidden gem. GIS joint ventures include a 50% equity interest in Cereal PartnersWorldwide (CPW), a joint venture with Nestle S.A. that manufactures and markets cereal products outside the U.S. and Canada; and 50% equity interests in some Asian-related joint ventures for the manufacture, distribution and marketing of Haagen- Dazs frozen ice cream products and novelties.
Unconsolidated joint ventures, which are reflected in GIS's financial
statements on an equity accounting basis, contributed an aggregate of after-tax income of $111 million in FY 08, up from $73 million in after-tax income in FY 07. This includes a net benefit of $8.2 million from restructuring, impairment and other exit related items in FY 08, versus a negative impact of $8.2 million in FY 07. In July 2006, the company's CPW joint venture acquired the Uncle Tobys cereal business in Australia for about $385 million. GIS funded 50% of the purchase price.
GIS has longer-term growth opportunities, including new products and international expansion. Investors can expect efforts will be made to expand gross margins in the U.S. retail business, including opportunities for increasing the mix of higher-margin products; trade spending efficiency; discontinuing less attractive products; investment in technology; and global sourcing. In the international business, we expect GIS to seek profit improvement in emerging markets and a leveraging of its infrastructure.
In the second quarter of FY 09, GIS sold its Pop Secret microwave popcorn business to Diamond Foods, Inc. (DMND: $23) for $192.5 million. GIS received pretax cash proceeds of $158.9 million, net of transaction-related costs, and had a pretax gain of $128.8 million (after-tax, $0.22 a share). A merger between Kraft and General Mills would generate significant spin-off opportunities and help finance the merger.

GIS posted $1.09 vs. $1.14 Q2 EPS on 8.3% sales rise. Note Q2 FY 09
incl. $0.49 net reduction related to mark-to-market valuation, $0.22 gain from the
sale of Pop Secret. Reaffirmed '09 input cost inflation estimate of 9%, says forex
translation now expected to reduce FY 09 reported sales, EPS for the year. Despite
this, raises $3.81-$3.85 FY 09 EPS guidance to $3.83-$3.87 before any impact
from mark-to-market valuation and excluding the Pop Secret gain.

General Mills has a relatively stable market, strong cash flows, and an S&P Quality Ranking of A- that reflects GIS's historical earnings and dividend performance.
The company formed by a Kraft and General Mills merger would benefit by leveraging the demand of both companies are facing competitive conditions, and other factors such as commodity costs.

Comments are closed.