Categories
Articles

General Growth Properties Receives Extensions

Here is the news, more on this tomorrow including more on Ackman’s role

Wall St. Newsletters

-General Growth Properties, Inc. (NYSE:GGP) (the “Company”) announced today the administrative agent under the Company’s 2006 Senior Credit Agreement received consents from the requisite lenders thereunder to waive certain identified events of default under the 2006 Senior Credit Agreement and to forbear from exercising certain of the lenders’ default related rights and remedies with respect to such identified events of default until December 31, 2009 (unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of such forbearance agreement), subject to certain conditions, including final documentation.

The Company also announced today its subsidiary, The Rouse Company LP (“TRCLP”), has extended the expiration date for its previously announced consent solicitation to 5:00 p.m., New York City time, on March 20, 2009. In the solicitation, TRCLP is seeking consents from the holders of TRCLP’s unsecured notes (five series with an aggregate outstanding principal amount of approximately $2.25 billion at December 31, 2008) (the “TRCLP Notes”) to forbear from exercising remedies with respect to various payment and other defaults under the TRCLP Notes through December 31, 2009.

The Company also noted that it has been informed by the representatives of an ad hoc committee of holders of TRCLP Notes, the members of which hold in the aggregate approximately 41% of TRCLP Notes, that all of the members of the ad hoc committee have committed to consent to the forbearance.

As of 5:00 p.m. on March 16, 2009, consents had been validly delivered (and not validly revoked) with respect to the following amounts of TRCLP Notes (click to make larger):

The minimum acceptance levels for each series of the TRCLP Notes are: 90% of the 3.625% Notes due 2009 and the 8% Notes due 2009; 75% of the 7.20% Notes due 2012, the 5.375% Notes due 2013 and the 6 3/4% Notes due 2013. Holders of TRCLP Notes who have previously validly delivered consents will continue to have the right to revoke their consents through the extended expiration date.

Effectiveness of the forbearance under the 2006 Senior Credit Agreement will be conditioned on and subject to, among other things, the successful completion of the consent solicitation and effectiveness of the forbearance agreement relating to the TRCLP Notes.

“We are pleased that we have been able to obtain consents from the requisite lenders under our 2006 Senior Credit Agreement and with the positive reaction to the TRCLP bond consent solicitation,” said Adam Metz, chief executive officer. “Given this support, we feel it is appropriate to extend the expiration date for the consent solicitation in order to give bondholders more time to receive and review the consent solicitation materials and to consider this request.”

GGP INFORMATION

General Growth is a U.S. based, publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust. The Company currently has an ownership interest in, or management responsibility for, more than 200 regional shopping malls in 44 states, as well as ownership in master planned community developments and commercial office buildings. The Company portfolio totals approximately 200 million square feet of retail space and includes over 24,000 retail stores nationwide. The Company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol GGP.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GGP

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Target’s Folly

Something about Bill Ackman’s Target (TGT) talk today on Bloomberg really bugged me after I listened to it. Took a while but it sunk in.

Wall St. Newsletters

Watch it again:

So, does Target take its best shoe associate and place them in electronics without any training? Would they take the head of marketing and give them the job of CFO? Of course not.

So, why then, as their business grows and expands into different areas, do they lack those who have extensive knowledge in those areas on their Board? It makes no sense. For Target’s board NOT to have expertise on it that covers the major areas of its business is just irresponsible at best, negligent at worst.

Selling groceries is not the same as selling shoes. The fact that the food is at the front of most Target stores is a mistake. Food is something folks need to buy. People will make more trips there to buy milk than socks. Put it in the back or in the middle and force people to walk past cloths and through homegoods to get to it (like Wal-Mart (WMT))does. Ackman is right that people there for food will pick up other items, but let’s make them go buy them for the impulse buy.

Target execs are making a huge mistake buy just saying “no” to Ackman. As their sales and stock price deteriorate, shareholders are going to take an increasingly close look at whatever he proposes. Last year it was just the TIP REIT idea. Now it is board seats. Eventually even the most management loyal shareholder is going to look at it and say, “Ummm, why are this guys ideas so bad? What have you done to turn things around?”

Last time I checked “doing nothing” was not really an action plan.

Note to Target management: Hole dug…

Disclosure (“none” means no position):None

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing’s Bill Ackman Talks Target (video)

Pershing Square’s Bill Ackman talks about Target (TGT) and his plans for it. On another note, I have been trying to get an interview with Ackman for two months, he chooses this international outfit called Bloomberg over me?!? Just because they have millions of viewers? I’ll tell you one thing, I would have let him finish and not cut him off at the end……..you have my number guys…

Wall St. Newsletters

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Ackman Going for Target Board Seats $$

Did anyone really think he was just going to go away? Target (TGT) us in for a battle whether they know it or not.

Wall St. Newsletters

In a just released 13D/A Filing

As of February 26, 2009, as reflected in this Amendment No. 5, the Reporting Persons are reporting beneficial ownership on an aggregate basis of 58,390,835 shares of Common Stock (approximately 7.8% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock), which include shares of Common Stock and shares subject to certain stock-settled American-style call options. The Reporting Persons also have economic exposure to approximately 1,250,766 notional shares of Common Stock subject to certain cash settled call options, bringing their total economic exposure to 59,641,601 shares of Common Stock (approximately 7.9% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock).

Item 4. Purpose of Transaction.

Item 4 of the Schedule 13D is hereby amended and restated in its entirety, as follows:

The Reporting Persons hold Common Stock and options for investment purposes. The Reporting Persons continue to believe in their fundamental investment case for Target, and that the Company’s Common Stock is undervalued at current market prices.

Representatives of the Reporting Persons have met and may in the future meet with management and/or representatives of the Issuer to engage in discussions that may include matters relating to the strategy, business, assets, operations, governance, management, capital structure, financial condition and/or future plans of the Issuer in an effort to enhance shareholder value. The Reporting Persons have engaged, and may engage additional, advisors to assist it, including consultants, accountants, attorneys, financial advisors or others, and may contact other shareholders of the Issuer and/or other relevant parties to discuss any and all of the above.

Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Reporting Persons are currently engaged in discussions with the Issuer regarding the consideration by the Board of Directors of the Issuer of certain candidates proposed by the Reporting Persons as directors of the Issuer.

Depending on various factors, including, without limitation, the Issuer’s financial position and strategic direction, the outcome of discussions referenced above, actions taken by the Issuer, and trading price levels of the Common Stock, the Reporting Persons may in the future take such actions with respect to their investments in the Issuer as they deem appropriate including, without limitation, purchasing additional shares of Common Stock or related financial instruments or selling some or all of their respective beneficial and economic holdings, engaging in any hedging or similar transaction with respect to such holdings and/or otherwise changing their intention with respect to any and all matters referred to in paragraphs (a) through (j) of Item 4 of Schedule 13D. The Reporting Persons may change their beneficial or economic holdings depending on additions or redemptions of capital. The Reporting Persons’ are in the business of trading — buying and selling — securities and other financial instruments. Consequently, the Reporting Persons’ beneficial ownership as reported on this Schedule 13D will vary over time depending on various factors, with or without regard to the Reporting Persons’ views of the Issuer’s business, prospects or valuation (including the market price of Common Stock), including without limitation, other investment opportunities available to the Reporting Persons, concentration of positions in the portfolios managed by the Reporting Persons, conditions in the securities market and general economic and industry conditions.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Rooting for Ackman

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

General Growth Properties: A Look at Real Estate Values $$

I am buying shares of General Growth Properties (GGP) today as I feel there is deep value in them.

Wall St. Newsletters

Where is the value? General Growth is a U.S. based, publicly traded Real Estate Investment Trust. The Company currently has an ownership interest in or management responsibility for a portfolio of more than 200 regional shopping malls in 44 states, as well as ownership in master planned community developments and commercial office buildings. The Company portfolio totals approximately 200 million square feet of retail space and includes over 24,000 retail stores nationwide. The Company is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “GGP”. For more information, visit the Company Web site at www.ggp.com.

GGP carries it’s real state holding at cost and according to its 2007 annual report, the total is $28 billion. If we take the 200 million sq. feet of retail space they have, the cost basis is $140 a sq. foot.

Now, let’s look at the MIT Transaction based cost index for the 2008 year. This matters because it takes into account what sold for what, not an estimated value.

Retail Current Cost

Using the $195 a sq. foot price from MIT, we get a real estate value for GGP of $39 billion. GGP has a current market cap of $115 million meaning it sells for .3% of its real estate value, that is point 3% not 3%. With $27 billion of debt outstanding and due in 4 years, if we subtract that from the current property value there is still $12 billion or $36 a share of value left in the properties (based on 331 million shares outstanding as of last 8K). Now, of course the actual amount will vary depending on what properties are sold where but we have a good indication by using national numbers because GGP does have holdings nationally.

To further boost a valuation, we can look at the age of the properties. Starting on F-61 of the above linked annual report we see that only $3 billion of the $28 billion total has been acquired since 2007. These properties one could argue were purchased at inflated prices and perhaps worth only equal too or slightly below carrying cost. The majority of the properties are 2002 and earlier giving a large boost to the “carry coast being far less than market value” theory.

Perhaps this is why Bill Ackman has taken a stake in 25% of the company.

The Loans:

On Feb. 12th GGP said:

On February 13, 2009, General Growth Properties, Inc. (the “Company”) and certain of its subsidiaries, including Oakwood Shopping Center Limited Partnership (collectively with the Company, the “Company Parties”), Citicorp North America, Inc., as a lender and as administrative agent for the other lenders party thereto, and certain additional lenders (collectively, the “Lenders”), entered into a First Amendment to Loan Agreement (the “Amendment”) which amended the Loan Agreement dated as of January 30, 2006 by and among the Company Parties and the Lenders for the mortgage loan secured by the Company’s Oakwood Shopping Center located in Gretna Louisiana (the “Loan”). Pursuant and subject to the terms of the Amendment, the maturity date of the Loan was extended to March 16, 2009. The Loan’s original maturity date of February 9, 2009 had previously been extended pursuant to agreements between the Company Parties and the Lenders.

The Company is currently in default under certain of its loans. As previously announced, the Company has entered into forbearance agreements with certain of its lenders pursuant to which such lenders have agreed to forbear from exercising certain of their default related rights and remedies under such loans. However, the forbearance agreements related to mortgage loans secured by the Company’s Fashion Show and Palazzo shopping centers located in Las Vegas, Nevada expired on February 12, 2009. The expiration of these forbearance agreements permitted the lenders under the Company’s 2006 Credit Facility and 2008 secured portfolio facility to terminate the previously announced forbearance agreements related to these loan facilities. However, the Company has not received notice of any such termination, as required by the terms of such forbearance agreements. In addition, the Company has also been unable to enter into or extend forbearance or similar agreements for its other mature secured mortgage loans, and there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so. The Company continues to work with its lenders with respect to loans under which it is in default or may be in default in the near future.

What does it all mean. Simply, even if GGP were forced into bankruptcy, the actual value of it exceeds the debt meaning there is still large value for shareholders. At $.43 cents a share, the upside is stunning and the downside is limited to your investment, $.43 cents.

What will the lenders do? Think about it. Do the lenders really want to start writing down commercial real estate loans for one of the largest property owners in the US by forcing it into bankruptcy? No. Why? In our “mark to market” world we now live in, this would mean that debt on other strapped REIT’s would then have to be “marked down” also causing more billion dollar losses for banks. Not good.

This is the reason for the various debt extensions for GGP.

Earnings come out today after being delayed for two weeks. One has to expect some news to accompany them. I am buying shares ahead of it

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GGP

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing Square Files 13F….Back to the Beginning $$

No more AIG (AIG), Lowes (LOW) or Mastercard (MA). Ackman did not take Wells Fargo (WFC) shares in the Wachobia (WB) buyout, he added REIT’s General Growth Properties (GGP) and Alexanders (ALX) 

Wall St. Newsletters

So, what is the “back to the beginning” stuff? Remember a young college student Bill Ackman? He paid half his tuition as a student by snapping up shares in Alexander’s Inc. at $8.50, days before the retailer went bankrupt. As he suspected, the real estate proved so valuable the shares now trade at nearly $57 (in 1993 when it was reported). Alexanders now trades at $157,down from $425 in September.

For those wondering, the General Growth Properties investment is an identical bet by Ackman (read more about it here).

November 2008 Filing:

Feb. 2009 Filing

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing’s Lettter to Shareholders Regarding Target $$

Ackman feels that like Wendy’s (WEN) and McDonalds (MCD) he will eventually prevail in Target (TGT)

Wall St. Newsletters

Pershing Square IV Letter to Investors

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Finance & Investing Business & Legal target william ackman

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing Updates Target Holdings $$

Ackman has taken it on the chin over Target (TGT) but is not giving up.

Wall St. Newsletters

From the filing:

As of February 6, 2009, as reflected in this Amendment No. 4, the Reporting Persons are reporting beneficial ownership on an aggregate basis of 72,890,835 shares of Common Stock (approximately 9.7% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock), which include shares of Common Stock and shares subject to certain stock-settled American-style call options. The Reporting Persons also have economic exposure to approximately 6,050,766 notional shares of Common Stock subject to certain cash settled call options, bringing their total economic exposure to 78,941,601 shares of Common Stock (approximately 10.5% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock).

Here is the trading data:

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Davidson Writes About Treasuries & What They Tell Us

<
I have named my optimistic and very intelligent new writer “Mr. Davidson”. It is a brilliant pseudonym and maybe someday I will be able to explain it.

Wall St. Newsletters

Davidson Writes:

If you learn the effect of psychology on markets you will come to know that you cannot predict bottoms or tops. These are unpredictable turns in market psychology and is directly tied to the use of margin in how fast greed can turn to fear. No one has a handle on this although many claim to have modeled some market behavior or other only to have a 10 sigma event prove the model wrong. Long Term Capital is the most well known, but lately the market is strewn with disproved models. AIG hung its hat on a model by a Wharton/Yale professor and “poof”

You cannot model human behavior. You can observe, you can place a historical deviation to it, but you better not hang 20xleverage as so many have done and lost.

There is no better indicator of market psychology than the Treasury yield chart. All maturities are rising. This reflects substantial flow of funds into other opportunities. If fear still ruled, you might see the longer term maturities rates rise while the T-Bill rates remained low or even turn negative once again. Not so. All maturities show fund outflows. THIS IS THE TURN!

Buffett recognizes this among others.

He also provides the following chart:

Of it he says:

We have already witnessed a return to par of the LQD ETF(Invest Grade Corp) and a substantial rise in the HYG ETF(HiYield Corp) as well as rises in all the indices since November. House sales appear to be finding a bottom, The insider buying is extraordinarily high, investor and consumer pessimism at record 30yr+ levels, savvy investors announce new commitments(Buffett, Ackman, Berkowitz, Cumming and many not as well known) weekly.

Changes are there for all to see if only they would give up listening to the endless stream of negative headlines. Markets turn without fan fair in the gloom of pessimism. I think the best time is to invest is now.

Treasury rates are rising across all maturities as this chart from Don Hay’s recent note indicates. The best interpretation in my opinion which has been offered by only few observers thus far is that capital is flowing from Treasuries to other parts of the economy and securities markets. The desperate hoarding of cash that has been a hallmark of the current economic slump is diminishing in my view.

I remain positive that the current financial issues will be resolved and that this chart provides strong evidence for this.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing Square’s 2008 Annual Report $$

Reprinted with permission of Pershing Square….

Wall St. Newsletters

Pershing Square 2008 Annual Report

Publish at Scribd or explore others: Presentations & Slid pershing square william ackman

Disclosure (“none” means no position):

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Barron’s on Ackman and Gates Recent Purchases

Barron’s talks about Ackman’s purchases of General Growth (GGP) and Gates’s of Otter Tail (OTTR)


Wall St. Newsletters



Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GGP, none

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing Square Files 13D/A In Borders Group $$

The good news for shareholders is that Ackman is in this thing (Borders (BGP))for the long haul…

Wall St. Newsletters

From the filing:
As of January 16, 2009, as reflected in this Amendment No. 9, the Reporting Persons are reporting beneficial ownership on an aggregate basis of 25,297,880 shares of Common Stock (approximately 33.62% of the outstanding shares). This includes warrants covering 14,700,000 shares of Common Stock, which represents 9,550,000 warrants received on April 9, 2008 and 5,150,000 warrants received on October 1, 2008 (each, as previously disclosed). The Reporting Persons own cash settled, total return equity swaps covering 4,805,463 notional shares of Common Stock (as previously disclosed). The notional shares that underlie such swaps are not included in the totals set forth in the charts earlier in the Schedule 13D. The aggregate economic exposure of the Reporting Persons to shares of Common Stock, including the aggregate shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Reporting Persons plus the aggregate notional shares underlying such swaps, represents approximately 40% of the sum of the outstanding shares of Common Stock and the shares of Common Stock underlying such warrants.

Item 4. Purpose of Transaction

Item 4 is hereby supplemented, as follows:
On December 22, 2008, Pershing Square, certain of its affiliates and the Issuer entered into an agreement (the “First Amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Agreement”) to extend the deadline for repayment of the $42,500,000 senior secured term loan owed under the Credit Agreement by the Issuer to Pershing Square, from January 15, 2009 to February 16, 2009.

On December 22, 2008, Pershing Square and the Issuer entered into an agreement (the “Extension of Purchase Offer”) to extend Pershing Square’s backstop purchase offer on behalf of certain funds managed by Pershing Square, set forth in the Purchase Offer Letter, from January 15, 2009 to February 16, 2009. On January 16, 2009, Pershing Square and the Issuer further agreed to amend the Purchase Offer Letter (the “Amendment of Purchase Offer”), such that at the election of the Issuer and subject to certain terms and conditions, certain funds managed by Pershing Square will be obligated to purchase all, but not less than all, of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Paperchase Products Ltd. and its subsidiaries (together, “Paperchase”). In advance of the acquisition of Paperchase, the Issuer (or certain of its affiliates) will either acquire any issued and outstanding capital stock of Paperchase currently not owned by the Issuer (or certain of its affiliates), or cause any third party holders that own capital stock of Paperchase to become parties to the stock purchase agreement for the sale of Paperchase to certain funds managed by Pershing Square. Pursuant to the terms of the Purchase Offer Letter, as amended by the Amendment of Purchase Offer, funds managed by Pershing Square are no longer obligated to purchase the Issuer’s approximately 17% interest in Bookshop Acquisitions, Inc. The Purchase Offer Letter remains subject to its original terms and conditions, except as expressly amended or modified by the Amendment of Purchase Offer.

The foregoing summary of the First Amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Agreement, the Extension of Purchase Offer, the Amendment of Purchase Offer and the transactions contemplated thereby is not complete and is subject in its entirety to the First Amendment to the Senior Secured Credit Agreement, the Extension of Purchase Offer and the Amendment of Purchase Offer, which are filed as Exhibits 99.1, 99.2 and 99.3 hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.

The Reporting persons have been and continue to be in discussions with the Issuer regarding financing transactions, including the backstop purchase offer, set forth in the Purchase Offer Letter, as extended and amended pursuant to the Extension of Purchase Offer and the Amendment of Purchase Offer, and alternative commitments and transactions (collectively, “Financing Transactions”). Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Schedule 13D or otherwise, the Reporting Persons may cease these discussions at any time and can make no assurance that any Financing Transaction will be successfully negotiated and/or consummated.

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE SENIOR SECURED CREDIT AGREEMENT

AMENDMENT OF PURCHASE OFFER

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Is Ulrich’s Move at Target Good for Bill Ackman? $$

A new CEO always makes some changes. Will Steinhafel look closer at Pershing Square’s proposal?

Wall St. Newsletters

Here is the news:

The WSJ Reports:

Target Corp. said chairman Bob Ulrich will retire at the end of the month, and will be succeeded by Chief Executive Gregg Steinhafel, completing a transition that began when Mr. Steinhafel was tapped for his current post a year ago.

Mr. Ulrich will become chairman emeritus, the retailer said.

The 53-year old Mr. Steinhafel joined Target in 1979 and became president in 1999. Target announced last January that he would succeed Mr. Ulrich as CEO, although he didn’t take the reins until last May. He was named to the board two years ago.

Mr. Ulrich has spent his entire 41-year career at Target and its predecessor company, Dayton’s, starting as a merchandise trainee. He became its president in 1984 and chairman and CEO three years later. Mr. Ulrich is credited with creating Target’s “cheap chic” marketing strategy some 20 years ago.

Like so many other retailers, Target has been struggling with slackening sales as shoppers rein in discretionary spending in the face of the housing-market collapse, the financial-markets meltdown, gyrating gasoline prices and tight credit. Last week Target said its December same-store sales fell 4.1%, in line with its expectations. But it said that markdowns “pressured profits.”

In addition to slowing sales, Target’s profits have suffered as an increasing number of its shoppers default on credit-card payments.

“As we look to the future, we are completely confident in Gregg’s leadership and his ability to build on Bob Ulrich’s legacy by continuing to deliver a superior guest experience,” said Vice Chairman Jim Johnson.

Now, let’s look back at the proposal from Ackman:

The plan was endorsed by Lazard.

Target (TGT) is facing increasing credit card losses on it portfolio. It should be noted that these losses are smaller that would have been had they not listened to Ackman and sold 1/2 the portfolio to JP Morgan (JPM).

What the transaction proposed by Ackman does (listen to the presentation for more detail) is frees up a very valuable commodity right now for any retailer….cash. It lowers land acquisition costs for expansion, increases cash flow to the retailer, lowers capex costs and more.

What is not clear was why the Ackman deal was really declined. Here is the press release put out at the time.

Here is the interesting part. When this was issued, Ackman’s reply was that he would “wait until after the holiday’s to address concern’s with management”. Now we see Ulrich retire. Are the two actions related? Was Ulrich standing in the way of the deal and did he hold sway over management and the rest of the board? Did Ackman know this was coming and was this the reason for his dropping the issue for the time being?


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Pershing’s McGuire Named Borders Chairman $$

So, we now know what the delay was for in the Pershing / Borders financing agreement.

Wall St. Newsletters

Borders Group (BGP) today announced that Richard “Mick” McGuire, 32, has been appointed non-executive Chairman of the company’s Board of Directors, effective today. He replaces Larry Pollock, 61, who has been non-executive Chairman since July 2006 and has been a Director since August 1995. Pollock will remain on the Board as a Director.

McGuire joined the Board in January 2008 in connection with his role as a partner at Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P., which is Borders Group’s largest investor. At Pershing Square, McGuire served as a member of the investment team exploring investment opportunities in industries including retail, consumer products, business services and financial services. He is now departing Pershing Square to pursue entrepreneurial interests. Prior to Pershing Square, McGuire held positions at private equity funds J.H. Whitney & Co., and Stonington Partners, Inc. He holds a master’s degree in business administration (MBA) from Harvard Business School and a bachelor’s degree from Princeton University.

“Mick is extremely smart and capable,” said Pershing Square founder and Chief Executive Officer Bill Ackman. “As a major shareholder of Borders, I am delighted with Mick’s appointment to Chairman. I look forward to the company’s progress under Mick’s and CEO Ron Marshall’s stewardship.”

“In the short time that I have worked with Mick, I am impressed with his constructive input, sound judgment and overall support of the company,” said Borders Group Chief Executive Officer Ron Marshall. “I look forward to working more closely with Mick in the expanded role of Chairman and with Mike Archbold in his new role as Lead Director. On behalf of the entire Board and management team, I also want to thank Larry for his years of service as Chairman and am pleased that he’ll remain with the Board as a Director.”

As noted, Michael G. Archbold has been named Lead Director. Archbold, 48, joined the Board in December 2007. He is Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer of The Vitamin Shoppe, a position he has held since 2007. Previously, Archbold served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial and Administrative Officer of Saks Fifth Avenue. Prior to Saks, Archbold was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of AutoZone and earlier served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Booksellers Division of Barnes & Noble, Inc.
Pollock, who as noted remains on the Board, is Managing Partner of investment firm Lucky Stars Partners LLC. Previously, he was President, and later Chief Executive Officer, of Cole National Corporation, which operates retail vision and gift stores and was sold to Luxottica Group SpA in 2004. Prior to Cole National, Pollock served as President and Chief Executive Officer of HomePlace, Inc., and earlier was President, Chief Operating Officer and a Director of jewelry retailer Zale Corporation.

It’s Ackman’s ball now. Largest shareholder, Chairman and Chief Financer all in one (two actually but one sounds better).

It will be real interesting to watch..


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long BGP
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Ackman Files 13D/A in General Growth Properties $$

Ackman now has an interest in nearly 25% of General Growth Properties (GGP) shares

Wall St. Newsletters

On 12/8 Ackman disclosed a 18% economic interest.

In today’s filing he has boosted that to 24%

“This Amendment No. 2 (this “Amendment No. 2”) amends and supplements the statement on Schedule 13D, as previously amended to date (the “Schedule 13D”) by (i) Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (“Pershing Square”), (ii) PS Management GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“PS Management”), (iii) Pershing Square GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Pershing Square GP”), and (iv) William A. Ackman, a citizen of the United States of America (collectively, the “Reporting Persons”), relating to the common stock, par value $.01 per share (the “Common Shares”), of General Growth Properties, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Issuer”). Capitalized terms used herein but not defined herein shall have the meaning set forth in the Original 13D.

As of January 9, 2009, the Reporting Persons beneficially owned an aggregate of 22,901,194 Common Shares (the “Subject Shares”), representing approximately 7.4% of the outstanding Common Shares. The Reporting Persons also have additional economic exposure to approximately 52,000,000 Common Shares under certain cash-settled total return swaps (“Swaps”), bringing their total aggregate economic exposure to 74,901,194 Common Shares (approximately 24.1% of the outstanding Common Shares). Although this Schedule 13D filing reflects additional purchases of Common Shares and Swaps, the Reporting Persons total beneficial ownership percentage and aggregate economic exposure has decreased due to the dilutive effects arising from the conversion of 42,350,000 common partnership units held in the Issuer’s operating partnership into 42,350,000 Common Shares, as announced by the Issuer on January 5, 2009.”

Here is the trading data:


Disclosure (“none” means no position):None
Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books