Categories
Articles

Thomas Weisel Downgrades AutoNation, Let’s Look

Let’s delve into the recent downgrade of AutoNation (AN) by Thomas Weisel.

Here is their thesis:
1- Geographic footprint may limit early cycle recovery:
2- Detroit restructuring could bring near-term disruption.
3- Sizeable premium valuation appears unwarranted

Let’s address them individually

1- Footprint, for this they conclude:

In short, the company’s geographic footprint virtually mirrors the housing boom, which we believe boosted highly profitable truck sales and historical earnings well above realistic levels for any 2010 or 2011 recovery. While housing sales may experience a “V” shaped recovery in some of these markets – we do not believe that truck sales to contractors and housing professionals will immediately follow.

Here is the data on AutoNation vs housing locations they provide:

I am not sure what it proves as while 20% of location are in high foreclosure areas, 80% are not.

Also, I think the #’s are off. If I go to Realtytrac.com, I see the foreclosure rate for Orlando, Fla is far lower than the Weisel #’s (latest data used):

Same holds true for Las Vegas (and the other cities)

Here is the problem with the data. They are using “total foreclosures” which is not accurate because it assumes those homes are still on the market (not resold). It also inflates the data to make is worse that the reality. Now, I am not saying the above areas are not worse off than the national average, I am saying that they are not nearly as bad as the Weisel data would lead one to believe.

As to the thesis is to the correlation between housing and auto. Let’s look at that.

First, historic auto sales and recessions:


Then housing, same time series.

If we look at sales since the last recession ’01-’02, we find that while housing sales increased 64%, auto sales stayed relatively flat.  If we go back to the ’90-’91 recession we find auto sales increased roughly 40% vs an over 120% gain for housing between recessions. Far from “boosting sales” the housing boon from 2001 to 2007 seems to have no effect on sales at all. This tells us the housing/auto sales link is a suspect one at best. What one should think is that it is economic activity that effects both, not one leading the other as both will rise and fall into and out of recessions.

That being said, because the housing boom was so dislocated from reality and so severe, so has the downturn been. There is still significant downside to housing still as inventories continue to grow and millions more foreclosures loom. Autos, however, seem to have stabilized at 9 million units. It appears based on all evidence auto sales will bottom and climb before housing does.

Why? Asset life. I can live in my home for 30 years or more. In that time frame I will own on average 5 vehicles. I do not need to sell my home if I do not want to barring unforeseen circumstances. I will need a new vehicle in a few years no matter what I do. Population growth also bodes for auto sales. As our children age, they need vehicles well before they need a home and when they do have the option of renting.

What Weisel misses is that a return to 11-12 million units a year for autos (33% market growth from the current 9m) is necessary just to replace what is coming out of the market due to age. Housing does not have this variable. What they also miss is the near 20% reduction in dealer ranks that will happen before this is all over. They briefly acknowledge this but give it little credence. It also means that AutoNation will have a far larger piece of that pie that is again growing.

2- Detroit.
Any disruption would be welcomed as AutoNation has made no secret of its desire to lower its exposure to domestic brands. A Chapter 11 by either of the large automakers (GM, Chrysler) would allow that process to proceed far easier than current.

3- Valuation.
Is it a value? After a 140% run, not really. Does it deserve a premium to the industry. Without question. When we consider competitor Sonic (SAH) received a “going concern” notice and is trying to sell dealerships that no one wants to stave off a Chapter 11 filing, Penske (PAG), Group 1 (GPI) and CarMart (CRMT) were barely profitable in 2008 at the 11 million units the industry sold. Because of this, a prolonged 9 million unit pace will eliminate many of these competitors.

The effect of all this will further expand AutoNation’s market share without them having to expend a single dime to do so. Along with the additional sales, a little talked about effect will be the pricing power and margin expansion fewer competitors will provide.

Weisel says:

We believe AN should trade in-line with the group based on what we view as an inferior brand and geographic mix and already lean cost structure, offset by relatively less leverage (more owned properties) and better stock liquidity.

I cannot understand the logic for this. Yes, 35% of revenues are from domestic brands as of 12/31. BUT, AN is also the #1 BMW dealer in the US and soon to be the top Mercedes dealer. How they conclude this mix is “inferior” to other dealer groups to me makes little sense. Additionally, the “geographic mix” argument falls flat when one takes into account that as of 12/31, AN suffered sales declines in all sales categories LESS than the national average. Were Weisel’s geographic mix scenario true, these numbers would have been worse. 

Weisel does touch on the fact that AutoNation “has the strongest balance sheet in the peer group thanks to owned properties” but seems to give that little weight in its analysis. 
To me, when you are looking at an industry in which it is obvious there is going to be a wrenching shakeout of competition, balance sheet strength ought to be weighted as paramount importance. Those with the best balance sheet will survive, period. Those who survive will emerge  far stronger than when it all began.
Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN, none
Categories
Articles

What to Short When The Rally Dies??

So, I have been droning on for what seems an eternity (few weeks) that I feel this market rally is just over done and due for a fall. I still feel that way but am getting to the point I am going to put some money where my mouth is.

Now, don’t get me wrong. I have been very happy to be wrong for the last month as the rally has been very good to me. Core large long holdings like Dow Chemical (DOW) (which was significantly added to at $6.80 in March and again at $9 in early April), AutoNation (AN), Sears Holdings (SHLD) and Wells Fargo have all seen tremendous share price increases of at least 50% since the March lows (am still down 10% in Wells Fargo overall though). This makes up for the gut wrenching carnage in January and February although Sears and AutoNation are up 50% and 60% YTD respectively.

Even Borders (BGP) has finally shown signs of life almost tripling in a few weeks (still down 40% in this small position).

That being said, I cannot escape the fact that the economic fundamentals of the economy do not warrant the general market rally we have seen. It is also possibly true that the drop we saw early this year was overdone meaning part of this rally is simply correcting an over reaction to the downside in March. I am hesitant to fully buy into that though.

There are over 6 million folks without jobs now, the housing industry is simply in shambles and getting worse, foreclosures are surging, Q1 GDP is decidedly negative and Q2 looks only marginally if any better. Commercial Real Estate is the next time bomb to drop on banks and that fuse is only just beginning to burn and the Federal Reserve is just about all out of ammo unless they want to start paying people to borrow. In short, not too much to be optimistic about..

Do I short CRE with the SRS ETF? Not for me. REIT’s are already on death doorstep so buying in there might be a bit like going hunting and shooting a deer caught on a trap, not very satisfying or meaningful.

Short financials with FAZ? Not too sure about that one either. While the rally there has been spectacular and unwarranted, it has become clear that the US Government will stop at nothing, including changing accounting rules, bogus “stress tests” and more capital infusions to make sure the banks are propped up. That being said, I am hesitant to bet against the guy with the ability to change the rules of the game on a whim to make sure he wins.

Short the dollar with UDN? Now, while, the dollar may be headed for devaluation because of massive Treasury actions, when compared to many other currencies, it may actually gain in value vs them. Its perverse. In fact, since December that is what has happened. Being “less bad” than the other guy isn’t really a reason to invest.

I think the safest way to so it is the simple SH Short S&P ETF, PSQ to short the Nasdaq or DOG to short the DOW. It tracks to daily price fluctuation of the overall index without exposing the holder to the negative returns of the leveraged ETF’s. The 3X’s ETF’s are only good for short term trades and the volatility will scare most folks. That and the downside pain is fast and furious and the longer you hold them, any downside you experience exceeds any upside you see later unless it is dramatic.

These can protect you from a market sell-off and unlike the leveraged ETf’s, not hurt you bad should the market continue to rally (which it can, markets are not rational by any means). I like the SH the best of the lot. Should I go into it, the position will not be all too large, just enough to take the bite out of what I think is the upcoming sell-off

Here is a good list of ETf’s

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long Stocks listed, none in ETF’s

Categories
Articles

Another 1200 Dealerships to Close in 2009

More good news for AutoNation (AN) shareholders.

From the WSJ:

In the first quarter of the year, 271 auto dealers in the U.S. went out of business, according to the National Automobile Dealers Association, as car buyers stayed away from showrooms and credit remained tight.

At the end of the quarter, there were 19,738 auto dealers in the U.S., the dealer group said, down from 20,009 at the end of last year. It said it expects about 1,200 dealers, mostly sellers of domestic brands, to go out of business in 2009, roughly 20% more than last year.

Many dealers closed as their lenders tightened terms and costs outstripped revenue, while some consolidated stores or closed up shop voluntarily. Light-vehicle sales in the first three months of the year were down 38%, with sales of domestic brands down 46%, compared with declines of 31% for Asian auto makers and 27% for European brands.

General Motors Corp. (GM) said 198 of its dealers closed in the first quarter, bringing its total to 6,177 at the end of March.

Chrysler LLC said it shaved dealer numbers by 82 during the first quarter to about 3,218 at the end of March. In the last quarter of 2008, Chrysler, majority-owned by Cerberus Capital Management LP, lost 74 dealers. In its viability plan in February, Chrysler estimated that 27% of its dealers were in financial trouble.

Ford Motor Co. (F) declined to provide the number of dealers the company had at the end of March. Last year, 269 dealers of all of Ford’s brands closed, bringing the company’s total at the end of December to 3,787.

Some brands are expanding their dealer networks even in the current depressed environment. BMW AG’s Mini, for instance, plans to open 13 outlets this year.

Already the largest US auto dealer, AutoNation’s market share continues to grow as the decimation of the dealer ranks continues. The industry is already at about a 9 million annual unit number now. The longer it hold here, the worse the damage will be for dealers.

It is also an unsustainable number. Most information I see has just the basic replacement number of vehicles that need to be sold each year at 13 million. That means there is tremendous growth down the road for the industry as a whole. Now that growth will most likely not come from Detroit and AutoNation has been ahead of the curve there as they are well on their way to having Detroit account for about 20% of sales. For those who do not know, AutoNation is the #1 Mercedes dealer in the US and a top BMW dealer.

Will the market growth happen this year? Probably not until the end of it at the earliest. The key point to take away it that it does have to eventually climb back to those levels and when it does, AutoNation is going to be sitting at the the table with a much larger share of the pie than it currently does.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN, none

Categories
Articles

Wilbur Ross on Automakers (video)

Wilbur Ross talks about GM (GM) and Chrysler with AutoNation’s (AN) Mike Jackson on CNBC.

Ross has a fascinating quote on bankruptcy as it related to a few dissident GM bondholders. Ross said “bankruptcy is about forcing the will of the majority on the dissident minority” as it related to the type of restructuring.

This goes to my General Growth Properties (GGP) thesis that in bankruptcy (Chapter 11) the common remains whole. Right now a majority of bond holders have tentatively agreed to postpone payments to talk about restructuring the debt. What we have in this situation a few bondholder holding up the works for the majority. The bankruptcy in this instance would be about forcing the holdout bondholders to restructure as is the will of the others.

There is no talk of debt to equity conversion, just debt restructuring as it related to GGP.

Here is the video:




Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long GGP, none

Categories
Articles

AutoNation’s Mike Jackson on GM, Chrysler News

AutoNation’s (AN) Jackson is clearly the class of this industry. Here he responds to yesterday’s news on GM (GM) and Chrysler.

On CNBC:

On FOX Biz:

From the dealership side,  Mr. Jackson went on to say that the industry has stabilized now at about 9 million units, and with the emergence of the TALF this month and GM and Chrysler’s reorganization finally being materially addressed the future, over time, should improve.

“Credit is still the key and is beginning to improve, but leasing programs still need to be revived. Floor plan financing is still difficult to acquire as well.”

Mr. Jackson reiterated. “However, there is no question there may be a risk of a downward spiral with an uncontrolled bankruptcy of General Motors and Chrysler, but if the government will provide material support and direction, this will provide the necessary stability that should allow the companies to come back with a new future.”


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN, none

Categories
Articles

Waiting, Waiting, Waiting

It really is the hardest thing to do.
Wall St. Newsletters

So on Sunday March 8th I was on Fox News talking about what I felt was an upcoming rally in the stock market.

That Monday the S&P (.INX) sat at 676 and today hovers at the 800 market for a 18% gain in a dozen trading days. Great? No. Why not you say? While I expected a large rally, I did not think it would begin the following day. Because of that, names I own and was looking at adding to like GE (GE), Dow Chemical (DOW) and AutoNation (AN) have all climbed over 30% since then. The bad news is that I did not add to them then.

Do you know how hard it is to have something you wanted to buy, at an unbelievable price climb and to not have added to what you own? The near irresistible impulse is to run out an chase it higher and buy is killing me. There is also the self aggravation of NOT pulling the trigger then because you decided to wait it out just a bit longer, yes, I’m annoyed at myself.

But, I’m not buying now. Why? While the market was in my humble opinion too low at 676, there is not a real reason it should be at 800 now, this soon. The economic landscape, while not deteriorating as badly as before, is by no means improving. Recent housing numbers were not positive, unemployment still getting worse and lending still restricted.

Banks, rather than taking TARP money and helping to expand the economy has grown tired of overbearing politicians have decided it is not worth it to have it and has said they will instead pay it back. This is bad for growth.

Now, things aren’t desperate. I am not gloom and doom. I just do not think the value of US business is 18% higher today than it was 12 days a go.

So I wait. I wait for the recalibration of value I think is coming and then I will be sure the next time not to miss the lower prices.


Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long Dow, GE, AN

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

UBS Downgrades AutoNation OR "Why You Should Ignore Analysts"

Let’s put this the nicest way possible, it now is obvious drug testing is not happening at UBS (UBS).

Wall St. Newsletters

First the news:

UBS bank downgraded the Fort Lauderdale-based company’s stock to “sell” from “neutral.”

An analyst report by the Zurich, Switzerland-based financial services company said: “We believe that AutoNation continues to face liquidity concerns, especially in the third quarter of 2009, when its debt covenant thresholds change.”

UBS analyst Colin Langan wrote in his report that “AutoNation is currently trading at 19 times our revised 2009 earnings per share estimate, above its historic average, despite its limited liquidity.”

The UBS downgrade came one day after AutoNation announced a new program to cover customer auto loan payments for six months if the customer suffers a layoff or involuntary job loss.

AutoNation (NYSE: AN) said Wednesday it will cover customer payments for six months in the event of job loss. The program starts Thursday in 33 South Florida dealerships. It’s similar to one announced by Hyundai last year, in which the Korean automaker allows people to return cars if they lose their jobs.

Customers must have been employed for at least 30 days and apply for unemployment benefits. The benefit does not start until the car has been owned for three months, according to an advertisement.

What does it all mean?

Well, for UBS to be remotely accurate, annual vehicle sales would have to:

1- Drop below the 9 million annual units they are now
2- AutoNation’s cost cutting program that is still ongoing would have to come to a complete stop
3- The “job guarantee” program referenced above, the one which Hyundi has called a “home run” would have to be a flop (Hyundai has seen sales fall by the lowest amount, due to the program)
4- Fewer dealerships would close, thereby eliminating the market share gains AutoNation is currently seeing
5- The recently enacted TALF would have no effect of the industry, despite that fact it already has.

Let’s not forget, Mr. Langen is predicting the US auto market out to Q3 this year. It just is not possible to do that at this point with any degree of accuracy. There are so many material events currently unfolding designed to free up the credit necessary for the market to grow that making an assumption about what will happen almost 30 weeks from now is just irresponsible.

There is significant postponed demand right now. A friend of mine who sells cars told me this weekend that loans that were a blanket “no” a month ago are now getting a serious look and more are being approved. The now 6 month backlog of buyers out there is starting to show signs of letting loose.

Let’s look at UBS’s history with AutoNation

They initiated it with a “neutral” in Jan 2008 ad then as the economy and credit markets fell off a cliff they maintained the “neutral”. As consumer credit totally froze in Q4 2008 and up through Jan. 2009, UBS was still “neutral”. But now, that the program AutoNation CEO Mike Jackson called for last year to free up consumer credit (TALF) has just been enacted, now that we are actually seeing signs credit flowing and previously denied consumers getting auto loans, now it is time to jump ship.

Time to jump ship for a reason that is unprovable and at best a wild guess. This just typical. It gets even more bizarre when you consider AutoNation itself is not giving guidance. They have said that the situation is too fluid and changing daily, therefore any look down the road can easily be inaccurate. In other words, the guys who are on the inside and have all the information aren’t comfortable looking down the road. Perhaps next time Mr. Langen next time ought to actually go to AutoNation, take a look around and talk to executives, it would improve the accuracy of his projections…

Remeber all the “buy calls and $900 – $1000 price targets from analysts in Google (GOOG) when ut was at $700???? today? $330.

You should give this the the same treatment…..ignore it.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN, none

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Why Are AutoNation Shares Surging?

For those who have not noticed, AutoNation (AN) shares have surged 193% from their October 2008 lows. They sell cars …….why?

Wall St. Newsletters

Reasons:
1- Cars fall apart. Demand for auto’s does not disappear. As a matter of fact, it has not fallen by that much, as sales numbers would have you believe. AutoNation CEO Mike Jackson has said he has full showrooms of customers, they just cannot get the credit to buy cars. Demand is steadily is building and customers will surge to pick up low priced vehicles when credit loosens.

2- Market share. Thousands of dealerships have closed of the last two year sand near a thousand more this year will go under. The good news for shareholders is they are not AutoNation’s. AN is picking up large market share gains “through attrition” as Jackson predicted they would last year in my interview with him.

3- Microsoft’s (MSFT) Bill Gates and Sears Holdings (SHLD) Eddie Lampert have been aggressively buying shares and own over 58% of it.

All that is great Todd you say. BUT, when does auto credit loosen? Well, it just might be now.

From Reuters

The first asset-backed securities offering under the Federal Reserve’s TALF program met with robust demand on Tuesday, leaving hungry investors clamoring for more of Nissan’s $1.3 billion deal.

“The deal was four to five times oversubscribed in the first eight minutes that it was announced,” said Mike Kagawa, portfolio manager at Payden & Rygel in Los Angeles, who did not get a chance to participate in the sale.

Through its Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF, the Fed aims to unclog the consumer loan market and jump-start the fledgling ABS market, nearly shut down by the credit crunch and soaring funding costs last year. ABS supply slumped by 82 percent to $159.8 billion in 2008 and has totaled just over $4 billion so far this year.

Under the plan, the Fed will make loans to investors for the purchase of ABS securities. Once the securities are sold, issuers of bonds will have freed up capacity on their balance sheets to make new loans to consumers.

JPMorgan Securities and Banc of America Securities are underwriting the “AAA”-rated four-part sale, which includes a 0.32 percent issue offered at a spread of 40 basis points over one-month Libor, a one-year issue offered at 185-200 basis points over eurodollar swap futures and two-year and 3.16 year notes at spreads of 200 to 225 basis points and 325 to 350 basis points over swaps, market sources said.

Other ABS investors agreed the deal met with very strong interest. “It quickly came and went,” another investor said.

Automakers, which rely heavily on the securitization market for funding of their auto loans, are expected to benefit the most from the plan. World Omni is also expected to be in the line-up of TALF-eligible auto sales over the near-term, market sources said.

I first picked up shares in May last year at $15 an change a then quadrupled the position in Sept-Oct between $7 and $8 for a now average cost of just over $9. Since they are up over 40% am I thinking of selling? No.

The turnaround story here is just beginning. AN is now a very lean operation and there are years of markedly improved earnings coming. As I first said in August last year and still believe, eventually AutoNation, Sears auto and AutoZone become one.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Sears Gains Appliance Market Share

This is great news for Sears Holdings (SHLD) shareholders

Wall St. Newsletters

By Mary Ellen Lloyd Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES

Sears Holdings Corp. (SHLD) increased its share of the U.S. retail market for major appliances in 2008 – its first increase after years of declines – as new marketing programs and price discounts helped sales.

The department-store holding company plans to build on its momentum in 2009 through a new rebate-finder program, consumer credit offers and an ongoing rollout of appliances to more stores in its Kmart chain, executives said in a recent interview with Dow Jones Newswires.

“We’re not doing any victory laps yet, but we’re encouraged,” said Doug Moore, Sears’ president of home appliances.

Indeed, Sears isn’t completely out of the woods. Weak appliance sales contributed to an 11% drop in comparable-store sales at the entire Sears chain in the fourth quarter. Even so, Sears picked up a larger share of the overall appliance market.

Moore wouldn’t share dollar or unit sales but said third-party research shows Sears maintained market share in the first quarter of 2008, then gained in each of the remaining quarters to capture a full-year increase.

With its top-ranked Kenmore brand, Sears has long been the top U.S. seller of refrigerators, washers and other major appliances. Lowe’s Cos. (LOW) in the late 1990s and Home Depot Inc. (HD) around 2001 began pushing harder to take market share, expanding selling space and adding brands.

Sears saw its market share decline from about 40% in 2001 to 29.5% in 2007, according to trade magazine This Week in Consumer Electronics, in conjunction with market research firm The Stevenson Co. of Louisville, Ky.

Second-ranked Lowe’s had 15.3% of the $28.1 billion retail appliance market, Home Depot ranked third with 13.8%, and Best Buy Inc. (BBY) was next with 6.8%.

TWICE typically updates appliance rankings in June. Bob Tancula, Stevenson’s vice president of research, declined to release 2008 numbers, citing the confidentiality of paying clients such as Sears. But he confirmed the company had stemmed market-share losses.

“Sears is still the No. 1 by a long shot,” he said.

The gains didn’t come from Lowe’s or Home Depot but were likely taken from smaller local or regional players. “Home Depot and Lowe’s market share in 2008 did not drop off,” Tancula said.

Category Hit By Economy, Discounting

Like automobiles and other big-ticket categories, major home appliance sales have been hit hard by the weakening U.S. economy, tighter credit and the collapse of the housing market. Industrywide unit shipments in the U.S. fell 8.9% to 68.2 million units in 2008, according to the Association of Home

Appliance Manufacturers.

And pricing has been very competitive. Sears regularly offered 15% to 20% off
appliances around the holidays. Home Depot gave up appliance sales rather than sacrifice profit margins in the latest quarter, said Chief Financial Officer Carol Tome. “It was a highly promoted category and we elected not to promote it,” she said.

Lowe’s spokeswoman Chris Ahearn said the retailer’s fourth-quarter unit market share was 18.1%, up 1.4 percentage points from a year earlier. But matching some of the promotions at Sears and others hurt gross margins. Moore, the Sears executive, said it’s taking share “in a financially responsible way.”

“We are not abandoning principles of profitability in how we go to market,” he
said, declining to provide specifics.

Customers have responded favorably to Sears’ “Blue Appliance Crew” marketing
campaign launched last fall, Moore said. As part of that, Sears’ blue-shirted
employees use Web kiosks to show customers other retailers’ prices on the spot,
potentially removing one obstacle to completing a sale.

The campaign also touts Sears’ delivery, variety of brands and financing offers. Sears has been able to offer no-payments and no-interest financing for 12 months on major purchases more frequently than some of its competitors, said Kevin Brown, chief marketing officer for appliances.

Sears’ competitors and some analysts don’t expect appliance discounting to accelerate. Moore said the company plans to capture more business by touting its repair services and by expanding retail space devoted to the category through Sears Home Appliance Showrooms and other newer formats. It also expects to add appliances to more of its 1,400 Kmart stores after putting them in about 286 stores in recent years.

New customer service programs could help, too. For example, Sears recently launched a rebate-finder service. Store employees can determine whether a specific appliance qualifies for a state, federal or utility company rebate through the “Energy Star” program, and they can walk customers through applying for the rebate when they make a purchase.

Sears is working to expand the program to manufacturers’ rebates.

Such conveniences may help close the sale, but the big issue facing Sears and others will be folks like Nick McCoy, who recently waited to replace his washing machine “until the puddle got too big to live with.”

McCoy, who is a senior consultant following home goods for market-research firm Retail Forward, said price and having the key brands are the key issues for most customers these days.

“It’s going to continue to be a battle,” he said.

This will not get much press because its effect now is negligible. This is the same story (too a slightly lesser degree) as Lampert’s other investment, AutoNation (AN). Picking up market share gains in downturns. When the appliance market turns, and like auto’s it will (they break and wear out) Sear’s will see out-sized gains from the increases.

For a retailer there are plenty of ancillary gains. People in the store shopping for appliances will spend money while there on other items increasing overall sales.

Here is the best part. What this does is begin to put Sears higher on the list in people’s minds as a place they can stretch their dollars. We are clearly entering a prolonged period in which people are thinking hard about every dollar they spend. We can see this easily in results at Wal-Mart(WMT) as perceived value drives customer behavior.

The fact that a customer can go to Sears, find and appliance and then be sure they are paying the lowest price for it saves a huge amount of time AND assures the customer they have made a wise buying decision. There is a great long term value to this.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Buffett on Auto Sales (Good News for AutoNation)

This goes to my AutoNation (AN)investment. Right now we are at 9 million units in car sales. Warren think 13 million is the normalized number (I tend to agree). Think about it. You have a company that is still profitable at 9 million units, whose market should grow 50% in the next year or so, who is gaining massive amounts of share within that market as dealership across the US close and most important has a CEO that is the class on the industry. I love this investment..

Wall St. Newsletters

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

AutoNation’s Mike Jackson Talks About The Industry

Bottom line, we are at depression levels for new car sales and Jackson still has his company profitable with strong cash flows. I have hammered this point here before and will do so again. The market share gains AutoNation (AN) is achieving in this environment as thousands of rival dealerships have closed the past two years assure a strong recovery for the company.


Wall St. Newsletters

Jacskon: “At $2 a gallon gas, people are not buying “green” vehicles and the migration back to big cars and SUV’s is already underway”


Jackson: If you want to sell “green” vehicles, you need to place a higher floor under gasoline prices.Let’s also not forget nearly 60% of the share are held by two people, Sears Holdings (SHLD) Eddie Lampert and Microsoft (MSFT) Founder Bill Gates. Auto demand does not disappear, it wanes and surges. While folks today will hold into their vehicles a little longer and repair them (witness recent sales at AutoZone (AZO))eventually they need to be replaced. Jackson and his company will be a much larger player in that field when it does happen.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN, SHLD, none



Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Lampert’s "Bad Investment" Up 70% In 6 Months and Other Thoughts $$

Remember last fall when AutoZone (AZO) fell under $100 a share and CNBC was doing it’s “Lampert has lost it” refrain? What a difference a few months make…

Wall St. Newsletters

AutoZone, Inc. (NYSE:AZO) today reported net sales of $1.4 billion for its second quarter (12 weeks) ended February 14, 2009, an increase of 8.1% from fiscal second quarter 2008 (12 weeks). Domestic same store sales, or sales for stores open at least one year, increased 6.0% for the quarter.

Net income for the quarter increased $9.2 million, or 8.6%, over the same period last year to $115.9 million, while diluted earnings per share increased 21.1% to $2.03 per share from $1.67 per share in the year-ago quarter.

For the quarter, gross profit, as a percentage of sales, was 49.7% (versus 49.9% last year). Gross margin was negatively impacted by higher than prior year shrink expense of approximately 30 basis points offset in part by lower distribution costs as a percentage of sales due to improved efficiencies and lower fuel costs. Operating expenses, as a percentage of sales, were 34.9% (versus 35.2% last year). The lower operating expense ratio primarily reflected positive leverage of store operating expenses of approximately 80 basis points due to higher sales volumes and lower promotion costs, offset in part by higher investments in hub store enhancements of approximately 20 basis points, higher medical costs, and an increase in legal costs associated with estimates for minor settlements.

Under its share repurchase program, AutoZone repurchased 2.8 million shares of its common stock for $375 million during the second quarter, at an average price of $133 per share. Year-to-date the Company has purchased $647.2 million of stock, at an average price of $128 per share. The Company has $462 million remaining under its current share repurchase authorization.

Now, Lampert first began buying AutoZone shares in 1998. Those shares are up over 345% despite two recession, the tech bubble collapse and the current sell-off. In fact, in the last year, AZO is up 28% vs a 47% decline in the S&P. By early 2000, Lampert owned 21 million shares of AutoZone. Why does that matter? Today he owns just over 23 million shares after recent purchases late 2008 and early this year. What is also of note is through share repurchases he spurred at AutoZone, his ownership share has gone from 16% in 2000 to near 50% today.

Does any of this sound familiar?

Much of the commentary on Sears (SHLD) focuses on recent share price losses. What is lost in the debate is that early shareholders with Lampert are still sitting on gains despite that fall. Meanwhile Lampert has steadily reduced the outstanding share count and increased ownership percentages for current shareholders. Let’s also not forget that Sears has a balance sheet second only to Wal-Mart (WMT) and Target (TGT) in the retail space with $1.3 billion of cash on the books.

One also should credit Lampert for selling Sears credit card division in 2007 (2006?) for top dollar at the time. Anyone who follows Target knows that store credit cards are becoming an giant albatross on hanging on the neck of retail earnings.

Yes he is under with Citi (C), Sallie Mae (SLM) and a few other small positions but when measuring Lampert and Buffett, we need to look back after years, not 6 months. When you have an $8 billion portfolio (not including cash, that is not disclosed), a $19 million Home Depot (HD)investment is less than .2% of assets (note: that is “point” 2% … not 2%). For comparisons sake, Lampert has $2.3 billion in AutoZone stock, a $.80 cent rise in those shares cover the entire Home Depot investment.

Why the media disdain? One can only guess. My assumption would be that he has a loyal investor base and just does not talk to the media and that pisses them off. He also shuns communication with analysts. He essentially communicates once a year through his annual letter and the occasionally letter in between. That is it and the media hates it. Just guessing but can’t really come up with a better reason, if anyone has one, please comment below

For example it is rare to hear a story about the dismal auto environment without hearing how Lampert’s investment in AutoNation (AN) is “down “x” from its highs”. What is omitted is that AutoZone gains of $1.4 billion just since the $92 November 2008 low more than offset the approx. $700 million reduction in the value of AutoNation shares. Since the early 2008 high.

Note: a true “loss” number is hard to deduce because of heavy buying in 2008 of AN shares, lowering Lampert’s costs basis. For instance Lampert picked up millions of shares last fall between $6 and $10 a share, those purchases are gains currently. This means the actual loss on AN shares is most likely less than I stated above but we will just go with the guess above.

As for the end game. Here are my thoughts on that

The point is not to get too caught up with a single tiny investment in a portfolio and really do not get too caught up in the MSM.

Much of the malignant chatter about Berkshire’s (BRK.A) Warren Buffett’s “equity put options” is baseless. Those who wonder out loud if it will destroy Berkshire only prove they know little to nothing about the transaction. For instance. Buffett got $4.7 billion in 15-20 yr. S&P index puts covering $37 billion. Warren is on the hook for the full amount if at the end of the option (15-20 years) the S&P stands at 0, no chance. If at the end it is down 25% from last year, he owes $9 billion. BUT, he only need to grow the $4.7 billion just under 3% a year to cover it. In short, the option was basically a dirt free loan he can grow.

Anyone who says “Berkshire is on the hook for $37 billion” ought to be taken off your reading list….now.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN, SHLD, WMT, none

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

AutoNation 10-K & ESL

There is a very interesting sentence in there about ESL and Eddie Lampert.

Wall St. Newsletters

The applicable sentence is highlighted by me below…

From the 10-K

In January 2009, our Board of Directors authorized and approved letter agreements with certain automotive manufacturers in order to, among other things, eliminate any potential adverse consequences under our framework agreements with those manufacturers in the event that ESL Investments, Inc. and certain of its investment affiliates (together, “ESL”) acquires 50% or more of our common stock. The letter agreements with American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“Honda”) and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“Toyota”) also contain governance-related and other provisions as described below. Also a party to both the Honda and Toyota Agreements is ESL, our largest shareholder. As of February 6, 2009, ESL beneficially owned approximately 45% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

Under the terms of the Honda Agreement, Honda has agreed not to assert its right to purchase our Honda and Acura franchises and/or similar remedies under the manufacturer framework agreement between Honda and the Company in the event that ESL acquires 50% or more of our common stock. If ESL acquires more than 50% of our common stock, ESL has agreed to vote all shares in excess of 50% in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. In addition, we have agreed to ensure that a majority of our Board is independent of both the Company and ESL under existing New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) listing standards. Furthermore, the Honda Agreement provides that Honda’s consent does not apply to a “going private” transaction under Rule 13e-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The terms and conditions of the Honda Agreement will only apply at such time and for so long as ESL owns more than 50% of our common stock.

Under the terms of the Toyota Agreement, Toyota has agreed not to assert its right to purchase our Toyota and Lexus franchises and/or similar remedies under the manufacturer framework agreement between Toyota and the Company in the event that ESL acquires 50% or more of our common stock. If ESL acquires more than 50% of our common stock, ESL has agreed to vote all shares in excess of 50% in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. Furthermore, we have agreed that a majority of our Board will be independent from both the Company and from ESL under existing NYSE listing standards. We have also agreed not to merge, consolidate, or combine with any entity owned or controlled by ESL unless Toyota consents thereto. In addition, the Toyota Agreement provides that in the event that we appoint a Chief Operating Officer who, in the good faith judgment of our Board, does not have sufficient breadth and depth of experience, a relevant, successful automotive track record, and extensive successful automotive experience, ESL shall be required to divest its shares in excess of 50% within nine (9) months or its voting interest will be limited to 25%, and if ESL does not divest such shares within eighteen (18) months, it will lose all voting rights until it divests such shares. The terms and conditions of the Toyota Agreement will only apply at such time and for so long as ESL owns more than 50% of our common stock and will terminate on December 31, 2009 with respect to future stock acquisitions by ESL, provided that ESL may seek successive annual one-year extensions, and Toyota may not unreasonably withhold or delay its consent thereto.

In connection with the Toyota and Honda agreements described above, in January 2009, our Board authorized and approved a separate letter agreement between the Company and ESL in which ESL has agreed to vote shares of our common stock owned by ESL in excess of 45% in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. The ESL Agreement expires on January 28, 2010, unless extended by mutual agreement of the parties.

This is the first time I have seen in a filing the thought that AutoNation may be “merged with another entity”. hmmmmmm

Readers here know that for a while now I have thought Lampert’s end game is an AutoNation (AN), Sears Holdings (SHLD) and AutoZone (AZO). The reason can be found here.

Share Repurchases:
On October 23, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program (the “Share Repurchase Program”), which authorized AutoNation to repurchase up to $250 million in shares of our common stock. The Share Repurchase Program does not have an expiration date. During the fourth quarter of 2008, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock. As of December 31, 2008, up to $142.7 million in shares may yet be repurchased under the Share Repurchase Program.

Sales:
Interesting statistic. Luxury sales were down 16% vs 29% for domestic for the company. In 1999, AN was 70% domestic 30% import/luxury. In 2009 those numbers will be almost 80% import/luxury vs just over 20% domestic.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

More Thoughts on the AutoDealer Decimation

Folks keep asking me about US auto dealers and how much the market is shrinking. Some numbers..

Wall St. Newsletters

From USA Today:

Auto sales last year were a paltry 13.2 million, the worst since 1992 and down 18% from 2007. This year, forecasts are 10 million to 10.5 million. The reality: Too many dealers; too few sales.

“The whole goal is to be here a year from now,” says Mike Jackson, CEO of AutoNation, (AN) the country’s largest dealer chain.

The industry will see a net loss of 900 new car dealers this year, the biggest thinning of the ranks in nearly three decades, predicts the National Automobile Dealers Association. That’s on top of a net loss of 760 dealers last year.

The numbers alone “don’t describe the pain,” said the NADA’s immediate past president, Annette Sykora, who has Ford and Chrysler dealerships in the small West Texas towns of Slaton and Levelland. Speaking to dealers at the group’s convention in New Orleans last month, she added, “Some dealers mortgaged their own homes to try to stay in business and still had to close.”

Counting all brands, foreign and domestic, there are about 20,000 new car dealerships in the USA. Consultant Grant Thornton recently estimated the optimal number at about 16,000. At that level, dealers on average should be able to sell as many cars this year as they did 10 years ago — about 750 each.

GM, Ford and Chrysler dealers will bear the brunt of the closings because of the Detroit 3’s market share losses. From a high of 8 out of 10 new cars sold in 1984, their market share today hovers around 50%. Weak dealers aren’t profitable, aren’t able to keep their facilities as clean and modern as competitors’ and generally hurt the image of the brands they sell.

State franchise laws generally make it difficult and expensive for an automaker to close or buy out a dealer. So automakers have been letting the recession do the dirty work.

What are the dealer losses looking like?

•General Motors. GM had 6,375 dealers at the start of 2009, down 401 in a year. The goal: 4,700 by the end of 2012. As one of the conditions for its loan, GM promised the government it would drastically slim its business. Hummer and Saab brands are for sale. Saturn could go, too, and Pontiac is to shrink. GM may decide what to do with them this month, said Mark LaNeve, a GM vice president.

•Chrysler. The weakest of the Detroit 3 managed to shed 287 dealers last year to leave it with 3,287 at the start of 2009. It was using a program called Project Genesis, aimed at eliminating overlapping vehicles in Chrysler’s lineup and pressuring Chrysler, Dodge and Jeep dealers to consolidate the brands under one roof. This year the program was iced because Chrysler had a bigger need: survival.

•Ford Motor. Ford continues to reduce dealers in metro areas but doesn’t have to be as aggressive about it because it didn’t accept a government loan. If it had, Ford would have to stick with a formal plan to show that it will become viable, which could include slashing the dealer count. Ford started the year with 3,787 dealers, down 269. CEO Alan Mulally is pinning his hopes on a second-half rally. Ford just tapped its remaining credit line from private sources. If that’s not enough, it will have to turn to the government.

•Foreign brands. Most import brands have proportionally fewer dealers and aren’t in the same shape as Detroit. Toyota (TM), for instance, has about 1,400 dealers, fewer than half as many as Chrysler or Ford, but it outsold both of those automakers last year. On average, a Ford Motor dealer sold roughly 500 vehicles last year, while each of Toyota’s averaged more than 1,600.

For a while now I have been saying what is happening in the economy while painful now for shareholders of AutoNation, is setting the company up for dramatic gains down the road. Domestic brands currently make up less that 30% of AutoNation’s sales and Jackson has stated his desire to move that to 20%. The business model at AutoNation has them owning the property their dealerships are on. That simply means they can convert a Ford (F) or GM (GM) dealership to a Toyota (TM) or Honda (HMC) easily without any landlord or property owner considerations.

It also means that Jackson is easily able to alter his product mix to capture trends in the markets place. While AutoNation may be part of the national reduction in GM dealerships for example, that dealership is not sitting idle, it is being converted to a more useful and profitable purpose (different brand). Here is a “did you know”, AutoNation sells 10% of the Mercedes Benz sold in the US (I do not have specifics but I believe their BMW percentage approaches 15%). This is the reason despite “depression conditions” in the auto industry currently, Jackson’s company is both cash flow positive and profitable.

When I aksed Mr. Jackson last summer if he would attmept to grow his market share through picking up cheap distressed properties or simply let is grow through attrition, his reply was instant….”through attrition”.

The above numbers are showing that those gains are going to be substantial to say the least.

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long AN, none

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books

Categories
Articles

Lampert Still Buying AutoNation Shares

Justa day after Bill Gates, who holds 12.2% of the stock filed a 13D, Sears Holdings Chairman (SHLD) Eddie Lampert added to is 46% stake.

Wall St. Newsletters

Lampert disclosed today he added 28k shares of AutoNation (AN) on 2/2.

Seems to be a race to own it..

Disclosure (“none” means no position):Long SHLD, AN

Visit the ValuePlays Bookstore for Great Investing Books