Categories
Articles

Sears Holdings Seeks To Acquire Restoration Harware

It is a small deal but one that has the potential to change the image of Sears Holdings (SHLD) in home furnishings.

In a filing with the SEC (below), Sears said it acquired 5.31 million shares for about $30.2 million in cash of Restoration Hardware (RSTO).

Restoration Hardware, is a specialty retailer of hardware, bathware, furniture, lighting, textiles, accessories and gifts. The Company operated 103 stores and eight outlet stores in 30 states, the District of Columbia and Canada as of February 3, 2007. In addition to its retail stores, Restoration Hardware, Inc. operates a direct-to-customer (direct) sales channel, which includes both catalog and Internet, and a wholly owned furniture manufacturer. The Company is a multi-channel business and its catalog distribution drives sales across Restoration Hardware’s retail, catalog and Internet businesses. The Company uses its catalog as the primary marketing vehicle, marketing to new customers and return customers, both in and outside the retail trade area.

From the SEC Filing:
“In June 2007, on behalf of Sears Holdings, the Chairman of Sears Holdings and another member of the Board of Directors of Sears Holdings approached a non-management director of the Issuer to inquire as to his views concerning a possible business combination or other strategic transaction involving the Issuer and Sears Holdings. This director advised Sears Holdings to contact the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer. Following this conversation, the Chairman of Sears Holdings spoke with the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer and discussed the potential benefits of a business or strategic combination between Sears Holdings and the Issuer. After that conversation, the Chairman of Sears Holdings spoke to the non-management director of the Issuer with whom he had previously spoken and this director suggested that the Chairman of Sears Holdings continue speaking with the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer.

Shortly thereafter, the Chairman of Sears Holdings requested an opportunity to meet in person with the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer to discuss the benefits of a transaction involving the Issuer and Sears Holdings. Due to scheduling conflicts, the Chairman of Sears Holdings and the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer did not meet during the summer. In early October, the Chairman of Sears Holdings, the President of Sears Holdings’ Lands’ End business and a non-management member of Sears Holdings’ Board of Directors had a meeting with the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer. Sears Holdings did not enter into a confidentiality agreement or receive non-public information about the Issuer or its business in connection with these discussions, and no price or terms of any transaction were solicited by the Issuer nor proposed by Sears Holdings.

In late October, in a conversation with the Chairman of Sears Holdings, the Chief Executive Officer of the Issuer informed Sears Holdings for the first time that the Issuer was considering a potential management buyout transaction and that a Special Committee of the Board had been established. After being informed of this development, Sears Holdings sent a letter to Raymond C. Hemmig, chairman of the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of the Issuer, proposing a transaction at $4.00 per Share (a 39% premium to the Shares’ closing price of $2.87 on the last trading day prior to Sears Holdings making its proposal) and informing him of Sears Holdings’ potential to increase the offer as a result of information gained from a due diligence process. Mr. Hemmig later responded by e-mail that the Special Committee was not prepared to have Sears Holdings engage with the Issuer’s management team and advisers in due diligence on the proposed terms and indicated that in order to have the opportunity to engage in due diligence Sears Holdings should revise its proposal to offer a substantially higher price.

On November 8, 2007, the Company announced it had entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Home Merger Agreement”) with Home Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, and Home Merger Sub, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Home Holdings, LLC.

Sears Holdings is seeking to obtain from the Issuer certain non-public information concerning the Issuer, as permitted by the Home Merger Agreement, and has indicated that it would enter into a confidentiality agreement in order to do so. Sears Holdings and the Issuer have discussed the terms of such a confidentiality agreement. There can be no assurance that Sears Holdings will enter into a confidentiality agreement or will receive any such information from the Issuer.

Sears Holdings intends to evaluate the Issuer and the desirability of proposing an acquisition of the Issuer and it also intends to review its holdings of Shares on a continuing basis and in that connection expects to consider various factors including, without limitation, the current and anticipated future trading price levels of the Shares, the status of the transactions contemplated by the Home Merger Agreement, the financial condition, results of operations and prospects of the Issuer, tax considerations, any non-public information which it may receive from the Issuer, conditions in the home furnishings industry and securities markets, general economic and industry conditions, other investment and business opportunities available to Sears Holdings, and other factors that Sears Holdings may deem relevant, and will in the future take such actions with respect to Sears Holdings investment in Issuer as it deems appropriate.

Such actions that Sears Holdings may take include, without limitation: (a) undertaking an extraordinary corporate transaction such as a tender offer or exchange offer for some or all of the Shares or a merger, consolidation, other business combination or reorganization involving Issuer; (b) increasing or decreasing its position in the Issuer through, among other things, the purchase or sale of Shares in open market or private transactions for cash or for other consideration; (c) seeking to acquire or influence control of the Issuer, including seeking representation on the board of the Issuer; (d) entering into derivative transactions, engaging in short selling of or any hedging or similar transactions with respect to the Shares; or (e) taking any other action similar to those listed above. Any open market or privately negotiated purchases, sales, distributions or other transactions may be made at any time without further prior notice.”

Why will this acquisition matter? RSTO is a very successful high end catalog retailer like, ummmm…. Land’s End!! We know Land’s End is the future of Sears Holdings retail and Sears will be able to market RSTO’s merchandise both in the Land’s End catalog AND in the new Land’s End stores (200+ to date). Restoration saw sales increase 40% in FY 2007 vs FY 2006 and the ability of Sears to seamlessly merge its merchandise into their existing operation will cause the segments sales to explode AND give more people a reason to look at Sears for products.

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Sears Holdings Discloses 13% Stake In Restoration Hardware Inc

Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device

Sears Holdings Corp filed after 5pm ET on Monday, 11/19/07, a 1-document, 2-page '3'

Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities — Form 3 for the period ended Monday, 11/12/07 filed as of Monday, 11/19/07, with respect to Restoration Hardware Inc

________________________________________________________________

This filing: '3' — # 0000898822-07-001384 @ 071119-222000 —

http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Filing.asp?D=rDX9.u1B7&CIK=1310067

Reporting owner: Sears Holdings Corp —

http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=1310067

Subject company: Restoration Hardware Inc —

http://www.secinfo.com/$/SEC/Registrant.asp?CIK=863821

________________________________________________________________

An SEC/CSA filing notification service of http://www.secinfo.com

SEC Info is the most sophisticated SEC EDGAR database service on

the Web, with billions of unique links added to the SEC filings.

________________________________________________________________

To cease new-filing notifications to this mailbox, click here…

http://www.secinfo.com/$/EMail.asp?U=valueplays@gmail.com&F=rDX9.u1B7&T=3

Do not reply. For help, go to http://www.secinfo.com/$/Help.asp

Categories
Articles

Monday’s Links

Bloggystyle, Sears, Buffett and Estate Tax

– Adam is outdoing himself

– Chad Brand notes the seemingly obvious (at least for me) direction of Sears Holdings. It is not obvious to analysts though. This is a great take on it.

– The REAL reason Warren Buffett is arguing for the estate tax? Hint: It is not an altruistic reason

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Sears Holdings: Earnings Release & Ackman Speech..Hmm

Sometimes in life things seem just a bit too odd to be just a coincidence. Thus the predicament us watchers of Sears Holdings (SHLD) Chairman Eddie Lampert find ourselves in after the strange timing of the upcoming Q3 earnings release.

The site Concentrated Value posts:

“According to Pershing Square Capital Management 13-F, Bill Ackman has accumulated a 5 million share stake in Sears Holdings. He is currently SHLD’s fourth largest institutional holder. I imagine Ackman wouldn’t make such a significant bet on SHLD if he didn’t see a catalyst.

Bill Ackman is scheduled to present at the Value Investing Congress (agenda link) on November 28th, 2007. Will Bill announce his intention and vision in buying into SHLD? Will he agitate Sears to sell underperforming stores to Target (TGT)? (He owns a large stake in Target as well) Will he mention the Sears Canada takeover he was involved in?

The date of the Value Investing Congress is significant because the following morning Sears Holdings will release Q3 earnings. Consider SHLD released Q3 earnings last year on 11-16-2006, investors will be curious to see if there is any significance to the two week delay. Will SHLD announce an acquisition? A majority position by ESL? Will they announce additional income and buyback programs from the sales of the Sears Canada HQ? Considering the 100% institutional ownership in SHLD, all eye will be on Lampert. “

I had not consider this when I posted on it Friday. Now, usually I dismiss 90% of what is said about Lampert immediately but this one really got me thinking. If it were not for the unusually late earnings release, none of this would be an issue but the timing of both, is a bit odd.

I am not a huge believer in pure coincidence when it come to this stuff. It will be a very closely watch couple of days. Ackman speaks at 9:40 am.

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Sears Holdings Earning Release: Why So Late?

Barron’s had a very interesting article yesterday about the release of Sears Holding (SHLD) earnings.

From the Article:

“…it was only late yesterday (Monday) that investors learned that Sears Holdings, which owns Sears and K-Mart, will report third-quarter earnings on Nov. 29 before the financial markets open.

The computer programs that detail earnings dates had predicted Sears Holdings would report earnings Nov. 13, which is three months after the company reported second-quarter earnings.

All the uncertainty about a basic corporate fact that so many other companies divulge without any great mystery, coupled with concerns about weakening consumer spending, increased the implied volatility of Sears Holdings’ options, perhaps even more so than if the company were transparent about its earnings report date.

Prior to Monday’s press release, most investors expected earnings before November options expire. This caused the implied volatility of Sears Holdings’ November options to hover around the range of 60%, or 12 volatility points higher than December options. In fact, many traders had implemented November “put spreads” — selling one high-priced option to lower the cost of buying another put option — to hedge against a decline in the stock. Today, investors have to readjust positions as the new earnings date occurs in the December expiration.”

Why the delay on Sears part? Easy. Lampert is busy buying shares back by the truck load and wants to get as much buying done before he releases the information. The delay gives him another two weeks to buy shares near their 52 week low levels (down 27%).

A reader alerted me to the fact other value investors have been busy buying shares currently (a thank you to Russ):
Pershing Square – 5 million shares
Fairholme Capital (legendary value investor of FAIRX) – 2.9 million (192% increase from last filing)
Third Point – 650K shares

Last quarter Sears’s board approved a $1.5 billion share repurchase program. Anyone want to bet that when results are released that buyback plan is completed? Does anyone think that ESL, Lampert’s hedge fund may have bought a few more shares?

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Lampert Adds to Citigroup Stake

We added to our Citigroup (C) holdings recently and we found out today that we had Sears Holdings (SHLD) Eddie Lampert as a fellow buyer.

According to his filing with the SEC, Lampert’s ESL Investments held 27.8 million Citigroup shares at the end of September up from 24.8 at the end of Q2 and 15 million in Q1. This makes Citi ESL’s third largest holdings behind Sears and AutoNation (AN).

Also during the quarter he sold his 625,000 shares of wireless handset maker Motorola (MOT) during the quarter and bought 16.7 million shares of Home Depot (HD).

Value investor like Berkshire Hathaway’s (BRK.A) Warren Buffett, Bill Miller and Lampert have been buying shares lately and that means two things, there are mis-priced stocks out there and the financial sector seems to be a favorite. Buffet recently bought Bank of America (BAC) Miller is buying Countrywide (CFC) and admittedly is buying others now (although the exact companies he did not disclose) and now Lampert is busy buying Citi.

How is that for company if you are buying financials…

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Walmart.com Sales Surging

“Customers are still spending for the holidays. Halloween was very good for us, so I suspect that Christmas is going to be great,” said Raul Vazquez, Walmart.com’s (WMT) CEO recently.

While overall U.S. online holiday sales are expected to rise about 20% this year, Walmart.com’s sales should jump between 40% to 60%. It would appear that the “Black Friday” Wal-Mart held the Friday after Halloween was success and that momentum is carrying over.

Vasquez said that unlike past years the retailer will post special deals on its Web site Thanksgiving day. The selected items, many of which will only be available online, can be purchased through the Web site that same day.

They are also planning special online deals for what it is calling “cyber-week”, the Monday through Friday after Thanksgiving. It will offer special deals on twice as many items as a year ago, and it will post new items on its site daily during those five days, he said.

They also have completed the roll-out of its “Site to Store” program that now accounts for 1/3 of all online transactions. It allows customers to order products on the Web site and have them shipped to a local Wal-Mart store for free. Vasquez said of the program, “It has exceeded our expectations, we expect it to rise.”

Wal-Mart is the place people turn to when times get tough and the consensus now is that they just may. That being said Wal-Mart is out front with its online site and the integration of it to the stores on such a massive scale. Sears Holdings (SHLD) has a similar program through its site but it does not compare to the Wal-Mart site in terms of ease of use and breadth of offerings. One drawback is that the Kmart and Sears sites and the merchandise is not consolidated, causing the user to have ti use both sites to find an item, not convenient.

Target, (TGT) based on what I can tell does not have a site-to-store program and that hurts them as it makes their site that much less convenient that the others.

Wal-Mart reinvented the retailing experience and now they seem to be reinventing the retailing internet one as well.

Oh yea…. If Lee Scott did not buy back at least $2 billion in stock the last quarter, time to go…

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Thursday’s 52 Week Low’s


WM Washington Mutual Inc 18.84
WL Wilmington Trust Corp … 33.41
WGO Winnebago Industries, Inc 22.94
WB Wachovia Corp 39.37
TXA Tribune Co New 58.50
TWX Time Warner Inc 17.46
TWC Time Warner Cable Inc 25.93
SIX Six Flags Inc 2.64
SHLD Sears Hldgs Corp 121.08
SBUX Starbucks Corp 23.08
PJC Piper Jaffray Cos 41.88
PFE Pfizer Inc 23.04
OMX Officemax Inc Del 25.10
OMC Omnicom Group Inc 46.42
MER Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc 51.97
MDT Medtronic, Inc 45.42
MDC M.D.C. Holdings, Inc 36.52
MCO Moodys Corp 37.18
MBI MBIA Inc 30.16
LVLT Level 3 Communication … 2.85
LUV Southwest Airlines Co. 13.00
LTD Limited Brands Inc 19.33
KKD Krispy Kreme Doughnut … 2.68
KSS Kohl’s Corporation 48.42
JWN Nordstrom Inc 32.29
HD Home Depot, Inc 28.46
DBRN Dress Barn Inc 13.62
DBD Diebold, Incorporated 36.99
CYBX Cyberonics Inc 11.95
CX Cemex Sab De Cv 26.59
CC Circuit City Stores, … 6.94
C Citigroup, Inc 31.98
BXC Bluelinx Hldgs Inc 3.90
BSC The Bear Stearns Comp … 95.92

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Sears Holdings Brand and Land Values

Analyst Seth Sigman of Credit Suisse calculated for the first time values on Sears Holdings’ (SHLD) property and brands.

In a report issued Tuesday he estimated values as follows: real estate, $9.5 billion to $11.5 billion; leased stores, $1 billion to $2 billion; distribution centers, $700 million to $1.1 billion; Hoffman Estates headquarters, $200 million to $400 million; private brands, such as Craftsman, Kenmore and DieHard, $3 billion to $5 billion; Lands’ End, $2.2 billion to $2.8 billion; and home services business, $2.8 billion to $3.5 billion. Total? $19.4 billion to $26.3 billion.

That is just the value of the land and the brand’s, it does not include the results of the retail operations which contributed $2.5 billion last year. Sears current valuation on the market? $18 billion, 7% below even the lowest estimate of just it’s real estate & brand value and 46% below the highest.

Currently shares trade at $127 and there are less than 140 million of them outstanding (we will know exactly how many Lampert has repurchased soon but he may have bought 10.4 million back). If we were to value Sears just on the brands and not on it’s operations, we get a share price of $137 to $185. We also have to value the operations and that gives us an additional $9.47 a share for the past 12 months giving us a price range of $145 to $194.

The important point is that this valuation include NO premium for either the brands, property or earnings. It is a flat valuation of the parts and a years earnings. What type of valuation do we give the capacity of Lampert to monetize the brands or the property?

Sears is trading at 13 times its current earnings, at the lower end of the retail spectrum. Consider Wal-Mart (WMT) trades at 15 times, Target (TGT) 17 and Macy’s (M) 18 times. If we add the value of the property and brands we can effectively double its current share price. The issue for the market currently is that the value of those items will not filter into the stock price until Lampert unlocks that value. If Lampert decide to sell or lease the land he owns, the value of that then filters into the stock price. If he licenses the Craftsman or DieHard brands, that value then filters into the price. Without anyone knowing what his plans are, investors are hesitant to make a leap of faith and assume he may take a certain course.

Thus the “hidden value” in Sears shares… Lampert is smart and will not sit tight forever. My guess is he is buying as much stock as he can at these prices while he can before he moves….

It’s alright, I got time…

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Private Equity ‘s "Time Out" May Give Lampert His Opening

Some thoughts on the effect of current credit conditions and whether or not they now give Sears Holdings (SHLD) Eddie Lampert an opportunity to make a long awaited acquisition at prices he will pay.

Drastically tightened credit markets have lead to a sudden withdrawal by PE firms making potential buyouts. With both credit and terms of it becoming less advantageous, many deals that PE firms would have made before are now attractive only to strategic buyers who can merge operations.

A look at the restaurant industry shows earlier deals by PE buyers included OSI Restaurant Partners (Outback Steakhouse) acquisition by Kangaroo Holdings, Long Star Steakhouse’s purchase by Lone Star Funds, and Ryan’s Restaurant Group’s acquisition by Caxton-Iseman Capital.

Now, if we look at recent deals we see that strategic buyers are the ones doing deals now. Applebee’s (APPB) pending $2 billion purchase by IHOP (IHP) is as transaction most people thought would go to a private equity firm. Rare Hospitality’s (RRH.BE)$1.4 billion acquisition by Darden Restaurants (DRI)., which operates Olive Garden and Red Lobster, closed just last month.

Back in June there was talk about Sears Holdings making a bid for Macy’s and at the time I said “Should we root for this? Yes. If Lampert goes for it, he is seeing value in the assets and name far in excess of the current price. The plus of having Lampert buy it? He will have the ability to quickly extract that value for shareholders, of which, we must always remember, he will be the largest one.”

I also said that a deal then was unlikely due to Macy’s (M) price at the time. But, consider now that shares have dropped over 25% since then and if Lampert were to make a run at the retailer, he now likely would be the only bidder, lowering any potential price.

Why would Lampert want Macy’s? Probably because of the value of it is along the same lines as Sears when he bought it. The retailer owns more than half of its 858 Macy’s and Bloomingdales stores. The rest the company stores it leases or owns on leased land. Owning Sears, Kmart, Bloomingdales and Macy’s would make Lampert option #1 for anyone wanting footage for retailing. It would also give Lampert a stunning array of options to increase shareholder value of which, it bears repeating, he is by far the largest.

Macy’s has a market cap of $13 billion about 2/3 that of Sears. Without any significant debt currently ($2.6 billion) and over $1 billion in cash assuming they complete the recently authorized $1.5 billion buyback this quarter, Sears could do the deal easily. Macy’s produces about $4 billions a year in cash from operations and Lampert would save another $275 million by eliminating the dividend.

PE firms were causing a bidding war for companies earlier in the year and with their specter drastically reduced, it may be the time for Lampert to make his next move.

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

ValuePlays Top Stories For October

Here are the most viewed stories for the month of October.

1- Warren Buffett On Fox Business News

2- The Dow Chemical and DuPont Drama Deepens

3- It’s Lampert Rumor Season Again

4- Berkshire Hathaway vs Sears Holdings: The Early Years

5- The Hidden Value in Sears Holdings

6- Verizon Finally Unveils Its iPhone Competition

Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

The Top Stories at Value Investing News

Here are the weeks top stories at Value Investing News

Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Monday’s Links: Another Thank you

Greenie’s Book, Morningstar, Thank You, Sears Holdings

– It looks like Greenspan’s book isn’t going to be the big seller it was made out to be.

– Morningstar examine the investing styles a guess what comes out a winner?

– Thank you to NY Magazine for the mention.

– Here is another look at the potential real estate value in Sears Holdings (SHLD)

 Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

The Week’s Top Stories at Value Investing News

Subscribe in a reader

Categories
Articles

Berkshire Hathaway vs Sears Holdings: The Early Years

The comparisons have been rampant about Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A) and Eddie Lampert’s Sears Holdings (SHLD). Let’s look and rather than comparing the 42 year old Berkshire with the 2 year old Sears in both their current states, let’s look at Berkshire’s beginnings and take an apples to apples approach when making the comparison.

First things first. This is not a “who is better” look between Buffett and Lampert but a look at the beginning of both businesses and the investment by both owners. Most people do not know about Berkshire’s beginnings and if we are going to make the comparison, we need to look back at Warren early experiences so that we can look at Lampert’s and draw honest conclusions. One cannot look at the finished product of Berkshire and then look at Sears Holdings, still in its infancy and draw any meaningful comparison. Doing that is a bit like one neighbor with a kid in kindergarten contrasting their child to the neighbors child, a 27 year old doctor and making an effort to discern their own child’s future from that. Can’t be done.

Given the recent stock slide of Sears Holdings from $190 to $130, many people have jumped ship on Lampert and given up on Sears and their Chairman. Gone now are the Buffett comparisons and the doubters have surfaced. However, if one looks at the history of Berkshire one also sees dramatic price drops. In 1973-74 the stock dropped from $90 to $40 a share. After the ’87 stock crash it fell from $4,000 to $3,000. In 1990-91 it fell from $8,900 to $5,500 and from mid-1998 to 2000 the stock slid from $80,000 to $40,800. A drop in the share price of the has very little to do with the ability of either Buffett or Lampert to do what they so best. As a matter of fact at the turn of the century, Buffett was deluged with doubters who said he was “out of touch” and did not understand the “new paradigm” of business. I think we all know how that turned out.

If we look closer at the beginnings, Berkshire was bought by Warren is 1965 for about $16 a share and, according to Buffett “had no net cash”. In fact, according to Buffett in the previous 10 years, the business had earned “less than nothing”. After two years of ownership (the same time period Lampert has owned Sears) shares fetched between $17 and $21 in 1967, virtually flat. Sears, shares conversely have gone from $50 when the deal was announced to the $130 they sit at today. At the end of the 4th year Buffett owned Berkshire it traded between $32 and $39 a share.

Earnings:
In 1965 and 1966 Berkshire was profitable but in 1967 saw a dramatic downturn in earnings and at that point Buffett used Berkshire cash and acquired National Indemnity Insurance in the spring of 1967. It was an attempt by him to level out the cyclical earnings of the textile industry and Buffett thought the insurance float would provide a buffer for the erratic textile operations. Soon after that was See’s Candy, Wesco, Illinois National Bank ans Sun Newspapers.

When Lampert acquired Sears it had lost almost $5 billion the previous 4 years and since he took over it has earned about $3.7 billion in just two and a half years and more importantly produces near $2 billion a year in cash for Lampert to invest in the business (that number will clearly be down this year due to the retail environment).

Lampert doubters will point to this years profit decline as their proof what he is doing at Sears is not working. However, if one looks at Berkshire in the last decade, one will see earnings large declines in 1999, 2001 and 2004 due to a challenging insurance environment. With retailers like Target (TGT), Home Depot (HD), Lowes (LOW), Macy’s (M) and JC Penney (JCP)all lowering expectations recently, 2007 has
shaped up to be a similar environment for retailers. An earnings decline is not proof what he is not doing is not working nor is the Berkshire declines in those years meant to absolve any issues at Sears but it is meant to illustrate that not all earning go up in perpetuity and a bad year does not mean disaster. What Berkshire fans always point to is the cash available for Buffett to use for investment in years that earnings suffer. Lampert devotees point to the same metric and how it is being used. Sears is so young compared to Berkshire that Lampert followers currently are focused on his use of that cash within Sears (repurchases, debt reduction, IT investment) and how those actions will maximize its production later on.

Shares:
Like Buffett in his early Berkshire years Lampert is using weakness to buy more shares. Buffett began buying Berkshire shares in 1962 and took control in 1965. He kept buying in 1965 until he had 70% of Berkshire shares and did not become chairman until 1970. Lampert first bough Sears in 2004 and 2005 and has kept buying and estimates are that he control almost 60% of Sears shares after the current buyback is done. Sound familiar?

The business:
Buffett was very judicious in his use of Berkshire’s cash in the early years just as Lampert has been with Sears. Unlike Berkshire, Sears is in a business that will continue to earn Lampert money and produce large amount of cash and will not eventually be forced to close like Berkshire was in 1985 (the textile mill). That being said Lampert, also unlike Buffett is sitting on a fortune in real estate in Sears Holdings and also billions of dollars in licensing fees from the valuable Craftsman and Kenmore should he opt to monetize them. Just because he has not, doesn’t mean he won’t, that is where the “value” lies.

Track Record:
Both Buffett and Lampert ran private investment operations before the big acquisition. Both had track records that trounced the markets as a whole and made themselves and investor very wealthy. Both were long term value investors who kept their thoughts close to the vest and invested with a time frame unlike their peers. Both experienced difficulties in the early years of their ownership of the business and used that difficulty to increase their ownership in that business.

In short, Sears is a better “business” than Berkshire was in 1965, what remains to be seen is what Lampert’s next move will be with that business. I do not think anyone has ever got very rich betting against either Buffett or Lampert.

Why start trying now?